Wheelchair users' perceived exertion during typical mobility activities
Study design: Each participant performed a series of wheelchair exercises equivalent in intensity to minimal functional speed (1 m s −1 ), functional walking speed (1.3 m s −1 ), a relatively challenging speed (1.6 m s −1 ) and a self-selected speed. Each participant also completed a graded exercise...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Spinal cord 2015-09, Vol.53 (9), p.687-691 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Study design:
Each participant performed a series of wheelchair exercises equivalent in intensity to minimal functional speed (1 m s
−1
), functional walking speed (1.3 m s
−1
), a relatively challenging speed (1.6 m s
−1
) and a self-selected speed. Each participant also completed a graded exercise test (GXT) to volitional exhaustion (VO
2peak
).
Objectives:
The purpose of this study was (1) to assess the physical capacity of wheelchair users as they undertake typical mobility activities and (2) to investigate how closely the components of a differentiated model of perceived exertion mirror wheelchair users' own perception of exertion.
Methods:
Eleven (eight males and three females) spinal cord-injured or congenitally impaired wheelchair-dependent participants volunteered for the study. Differentiated ratings of perceived exertion (RPE
_arm
and RPE
_respiration
) and oxygen uptake (VO
2
) and heart rate were recorded during each exercise.
Results:
The mean comfortable speed at which the participants propelled their own wheelchairs on the wheelchair ergometer was 1.1±0.2 m s
−1
. Speeds of 1 m s
−1
and 1.3 m s
−1
are typical of everyday functional propulsion. The corresponding RPE_
respiration
and RPE_
arm
ranged from 7 to 13 on the Borg scale; the %VO
2peak
measured in these trials ranged from 37 to 80% VO
2peak.
For propulsion intensities used in the present study—low, moderate, high and graded exercise intensity—no difference could be observed between RPE
_respiration
and RPE
_arm
. There were no significant differences between RPE
_arm
and RPE
_respiration
at the termination of the GXT.
Conclusion:
The current study showed potential for the use of RPE to assess and monitor daily wheelchair propulsion intensity in individuals with paraplegia. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1362-4393 1476-5624 |
DOI: | 10.1038/sc.2015.30 |