Effects of gastrocnemius stretching on ankle dorsiflexion and time-to heel-off during the stance phase of gait
The purpose was to determine the effects of a gastrocnemius stretching program on passive ankle dorsiflexion range of motion and ankle dorsiflexion and time-to-heel-off during the stance phase of gait. This study was a randomized-control trial design. The study was conducted in a biomechanical labor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physical therapy in sport 2006-05, Vol.7 (2), p.93-100 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The purpose was to determine the effects of a gastrocnemius stretching program on passive ankle dorsiflexion range of motion and ankle dorsiflexion and time-to-heel-off during the stance phase of gait.
This study was a randomized-control trial design.
The study was conducted in a biomechanical laboratory setting.
Nineteen volunteers (17 women and 2 men, mean age=30.3 years; SD=9.8 years), with less than 8° of passive ankle dorsiflexion range of motion bilaterally and a history of lower extremity overuse injury were randomly assigned to the experimental (
n=11) or control group (
n=8).
The experimental group participated in a static gastrocnemius stretching program of five repetitions held for 30-s, two times daily, for 3 weeks. The control group received no intervention.
Passive ankle dorsiflexion range of motion and ankle dorsiflexion and time-to-heel-off during the stance phase of gait were measured before and after the intervention.
The experimental group had significantly greater passive dorsiflexion range of motion at post-test than the control group on both the right (
p=0.000) and left (
p=0.002) sides. Ankle dorsiflexion and time-to-heel-off during the stance phase of gait were not different among group, time, or foot (
p>0.05).
A gastrocnemius stretch performed two times daily, for 3 weeks increased passive ankle dorsiflexion, but did not alter ankle dorsiflexion or time-to-heel-off during the stance phase of gait. Thus, when an increase in ankle dorsiflexion or time-to-heel-off during the stance phase of ambulation is a clinical goal, it is unlikely to result from the stretching regimen used in this study. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1466-853X 1873-1600 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ptsp.2006.02.002 |