Prokinetic drugs for gastric emptying in critically ill ventilated patients: Analysis through breath testing
Abstract Purpose The prupose was to identify, through the BreathID automatic breath-testing device, the best prokinetic therapy to enhance gastric-emptying rate (GER) in ventilated intensive care unit patients. Materials and methods This was a prospective, crossover, nonrandomized study. Consecutive...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of critical care 2015-06, Vol.30 (3), p.655.e7-655.e13 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Purpose The prupose was to identify, through the BreathID automatic breath-testing device, the best prokinetic therapy to enhance gastric-emptying rate (GER) in ventilated intensive care unit patients. Materials and methods This was a prospective, crossover, nonrandomized study. Consecutive ventilated patients who could be fed enterally and expected to require 5 days of ventilation were included.13 C-labeled-acetate in 100 mL Osmolite (BreathID; Exalenz Bioscience Ltd, Jerusalem, Israel) was administered intragastrically and followed by a 4-hour continuous recording of expiratory13 CO2 by the BreathID. Prokinetics were changed daily: (1) baseline (no prokinetic), (2) intravenous (IV) metoclopramide (10 mg every 6 hours), (3) IV metoclopramide (10 mg every 6 hours) and continuous low-dose erythromycin (10 mg/h), (4) IV continuous low-dose erythromycin alone (10 mg/h), and (5) IV bolus erythromycin (200 mg every 12 hours). Gastric-emptying rate was assessed by the percentage dose recovered (PDR)—change from time 0 of the recording in the ratio of13 CO2 /12 CO2 in exhaled gases (%/h). We used PDR peak values and time to peak (minutes to reach PDR peak) to express GER. Results In the first 17 patients (group A), baseline GER measurements preceded prokinetic therapy. In the subsequent 14 patients (group B), 2 prokinetic regimens preceded baseline. No order-time effect was observed, justifying pooled analysis of all 31 patients. Combined metoclopramide–continuous low-dose erythromycin yielded significantly higher PDR peak and shorter time to peak vs baseline ( P = .0001, P = .005, respectively). The PDR peak was also significantly higher from baseline during continuous low-dose administration of erythromycin alone ( P = .004). Metoclopramide alone did not improve GER significantly. Conclusions Combined metoclopramide–continuous low-dose erythromycin was found to be the best protocol in the current study to increase GER in ventilated patients. It should be tested as a first-line prokinetic therapy in ventilated patients with poor gastric emptying in further randomized controlled studies. The breath-test device presented in this study can be a user-friendly and practical method to monitor GER, enabling individual tailoring of prokinetic therapy. Further studies to explore its utility are warranted. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0883-9441 1557-8615 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.12.019 |