Does Continuous Hospice Care Help Patients Remain at Home?

Abstract Context In the U. S., hospices sometimes provide high-intensity “continuous care” in patients' homes. However, little is known about the way that continuous care is used or what impact continuous care has on patient outcomes. Objectives To describe patients who receive continuous care...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pain and symptom management 2015-09, Vol.50 (3), p.297-304
Hauptverfasser: Casarett, David, MD, MA, Harrold, Joan, MD, MPH, Harris, Pamela S., MD, Bender, Laura, BA, Farrington, Sue, MBA, Smither, Eugenia, RN, BS, CHC, CHE, CHP, Ache, Kevin, DO, Teno, Joan, MD, MS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Context In the U. S., hospices sometimes provide high-intensity “continuous care” in patients' homes. However, little is known about the way that continuous care is used or what impact continuous care has on patient outcomes. Objectives To describe patients who receive continuous care and determine whether continuous care reduces the likelihood that patients will die in an inpatient unit or hospital. Methods Data from 147,137 patients admitted to 11 U.S. hospices between 2008 and 2012 were extracted from the electronic medical records. The hospices are part of a research-focused collaboration. The study used a propensity score-matched cohort design. Results A total of 99,687 (67.8%) patients were in a private home or nursing home on the day before death, and of these, 10,140 (10.2%) received continuous care on the day before death. A propensity score-matched sample ( n  = 24,658) included 8524 patients who received continuous care and 16,134 patients who received routine care on the day before death. Using the two matched groups, patients who received continuous care on the day before death were significantly less likely to die in an inpatient hospice setting (350/8524 vs. 2030/16,134; 4.1% vs. 12.6%) (odds ratio [OR] 0.29; 95% CI 0.27–0.34; P  
ISSN:0885-3924
1873-6513
DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.04.007