Using natural language processing to provide personalized learning opportunities from trainee clinical notes

[Display omitted] •Portfolios used to assess medical trainees usually require manual review.•We provide students automated, customized feedback via natural language processing.•Our system searches trainees’ clinical notes for two geriatric-related outcomes.•Students receiving feedback subsequently w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomedical informatics 2015-08, Vol.56, p.292-299
Hauptverfasser: Denny, Joshua C., Spickard, Anderson, Speltz, Peter J., Porier, Renee, Rosenstiel, Donna E., Powers, James S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •Portfolios used to assess medical trainees usually require manual review.•We provide students automated, customized feedback via natural language processing.•Our system searches trainees’ clinical notes for two geriatric-related outcomes.•Students receiving feedback subsequently wrote advanced directives.•Students rarely clicked on links to didactic material following feed. Assessment of medical trainee learning through pre-defined competencies is now commonplace in schools of medicine. We describe a novel electronic advisor system using natural language processing (NLP) to identify two geriatric medicine competencies from medical student clinical notes in the electronic medical record: advance directives (AD) and altered mental status (AMS). Clinical notes from third year medical students were processed using a general-purpose NLP system to identify biomedical concepts and their section context. The system analyzed these notes for relevance to AD or AMS and generated custom email alerts to students with embedded supplemental learning material customized to their notes. Recall and precision of the two advisors were evaluated by physician review. Students were given pre and post multiple choice question tests broadly covering geriatrics. Of 102 students approached, 66 students consented and enrolled. The system sent 393 email alerts to 54 students (82%), including 270 for AD and 123 for AMS. Precision was 100% for AD and 93% for AMS. Recall was 69% for AD and 100% for AMS. Students mentioned ADs for 43 patients, with all mentions occurring after first having received an AD reminder. Students accessed educational links 34 times from the 393 email alerts. There was no difference in pre (mean 62%) and post (mean 60%) test scores. The system effectively identified two educational opportunities using NLP applied to clinical notes and demonstrated a small change in student behavior. Use of electronic advisors such as these may provide a scalable model to assess specific competency elements and deliver educational opportunities.
ISSN:1532-0464
1532-0480
DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.06.004