Coordinated lightning, balloon-borne electric field, and radar observations of triggered lightning flashes in North Florida

This study examines coordinated storm and triggered lightning observations made in July–August 2013 at the International Center for Lightning Research and Testing to determine why triggered flashes in Florida typically transition from an upward vertical channel entering the cloud to horizontal struc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geophysical research letters 2015-07, Vol.42 (13), p.5635-5643
Hauptverfasser: MacGorman, D. R., Biggerstaff, M. I., Waugh, S., Pilkey, J. T., Uman, M. A., Jordan, D. M., Ngin, T., Gamerota, W. R., Carrie, G., Hyland, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study examines coordinated storm and triggered lightning observations made in July–August 2013 at the International Center for Lightning Research and Testing to determine why triggered flashes in Florida typically transition from an upward vertical channel entering the cloud to horizontal structure near the storm's melting level. Data from a balloon‐borne electric field meter, a mobile 5 cm wavelength radar, and a small‐baseline VHF Lightning Mapping Array acquired during a period in which three flashes were triggered on 1 August confirmed the hypothesis that the transition to horizontal lightning structure just above the melting level occurred in a layer of negative charge. This experiment was the first to provide vertical profiles of the electric field in Florida storms, from which their vertical charge distribution could be inferred. Three dissipating storms observed on different days all had negative charge near the melting level, but a growing mature storm had positive charge there. Key Points Florida triggered flashes propagate through negative charge near the melting layer Negative charge is just above the melting layer of dissipating Florida storms Charge distributions are more complex in mature than in dissipating storms
ISSN:0094-8276
1944-8007
DOI:10.1002/2015GL064203