On the distribution of significant wave height and associated peak periods

This study uses 21years (1958–1978) significant wave height and associated peak periods off Azores in the North Atlantic Ocean, extracted from 44years HIPOCAS database. Empirical average conditional exceedances of peak periods are executed. Plausibility of judging the distribution of the peak period...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Coastal engineering (Amsterdam) 2015-09, Vol.103, p.42-51
Hauptverfasser: Muraleedharan, G., Lucas, C., Martins, D., Guedes Soares, C., Kurup, P.G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study uses 21years (1958–1978) significant wave height and associated peak periods off Azores in the North Atlantic Ocean, extracted from 44years HIPOCAS database. Empirical average conditional exceedances of peak periods are executed. Plausibility of judging the distribution of the peak periods by modelling average conditional exceedance of peak periods by Erlang, generalized Pareto and three-parameter Weibull models is investigated and we also assessed certain peak period statistics predicted by the models. 50year gamma peak period quantiles are reasonably accurate when compared with 44year peak period quantiles (HIPOCAS). Erlang and generalized Pareto estimate of mean peak period are reasonable; whereas all the three models fairly evaluate the average of the one-third the highest peak periods. Weibull model derived parametric relation gauged the average of the one-tenth the highest peak periods. A general statistical formula is suggested for estimation of significant wave period. Average of one-third the highest peak period estimates by the parametric relation derived from generalized Pareto distribution using the general formula for significant wave period, provides reliably precise results. Significant wave period to mean wave period observational ratio of 1.2 is appropriately interpreted for both computed and estimated ratios of mean peak period of one-third the highest significant wave heights to mean peak periods. •Distribution of significant wave height associated peak periods Tp by modelling m (tp)=E (Tp׀Tp > tp) explored•Derived m (tp) of gamma, three-parameter Weibull and generalized Pareto distributions for estimation of certain peak period statistics•A general statistical formula is provided for significant wave period (Ts or T1/3)•A formula (using the general formula for Ts) is derived from generalised Pareto model for the estimation of significant wave period (Ts or T1/3)
ISSN:0378-3839
1872-7379
DOI:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2015.06.001