Ultrasound screening for fetal growth restriction at 36 vs 32 weeks' gestation: a randomized trial (ROUTE)
Objective To compare the utility of routine third‐trimester ultrasound examination at 36 weeks' gestation with that at 32 weeks in detecting fetal growth restriction (FGR). Methods This was an open‐label parallel randomized trial (ROUTE study) conducted at a single general hospital serving a ge...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2015-10, Vol.46 (4), p.391-397 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
To compare the utility of routine third‐trimester ultrasound examination at 36 weeks' gestation with that at 32 weeks in detecting fetal growth restriction (FGR).
Methods
This was an open‐label parallel randomized trial (ROUTE study) conducted at a single general hospital serving a geographically well‐defined catchment area in Barcelona, Spain, between May 2011 and April 2014. Women with no adverse medical or obstetric history and a singleton pregnancy without fetal abnormalities at routine second‐trimester scan were assigned randomly to undergo a scan at 32 weeks' gestation (n = 1272) or at 36 weeks' gestation (n = 1314). Primary outcome measures were detection rates of FGR (customized birth weight |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0960-7692 1469-0705 |
DOI: | 10.1002/uog.14915 |