Comparison of the 2 Most Popular Deconvolution Techniques for the Detection of Penumbral Flow in Acute Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE—Dynamic susceptibility–weighted contrast–enhanced (DSC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to identify the tissue-at-risk in acute stroke, but the choice of optimal DSC postprocessing in the clinical setting remains a matter of debate. Using 15O-water positron emission t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Stroke (1970) 2015-10, Vol.46 (10), p.2795-2799
Hauptverfasser: Zaro-Weber, Olivier, Livne, Michelle, Martin, Steve Z, von Samson-Himmelstjerna, Federico C, Moeller-Hartmann, Walter, Schuster, Alexander, Brunecker, Peter, Heiss, Wolf-Dieter, Sobesky, Jan, Madai, Vince I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE—Dynamic susceptibility–weighted contrast–enhanced (DSC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to identify the tissue-at-risk in acute stroke, but the choice of optimal DSC postprocessing in the clinical setting remains a matter of debate. Using 15O-water positron emission tomography (PET), we validated the performance of 2 common deconvolution methods for DSC-MRI. METHODS—In (sub)acute stroke patients with consecutive MRI and PET imaging, DSC maps were calculated applying 2 deconvolution methods, standard and block-circulant single value decomposition. We used 2 standardized analysis methods, a region of interest–based and a voxel-based analysis, where PET cerebral blood flow masks of
ISSN:0039-2499
1524-4628
DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010246