Comparison of the 2 Most Popular Deconvolution Techniques for the Detection of Penumbral Flow in Acute Stroke
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE—Dynamic susceptibility–weighted contrast–enhanced (DSC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to identify the tissue-at-risk in acute stroke, but the choice of optimal DSC postprocessing in the clinical setting remains a matter of debate. Using 15O-water positron emission t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Stroke (1970) 2015-10, Vol.46 (10), p.2795-2799 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE—Dynamic susceptibility–weighted contrast–enhanced (DSC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to identify the tissue-at-risk in acute stroke, but the choice of optimal DSC postprocessing in the clinical setting remains a matter of debate. Using 15O-water positron emission tomography (PET), we validated the performance of 2 common deconvolution methods for DSC-MRI.
METHODS—In (sub)acute stroke patients with consecutive MRI and PET imaging, DSC maps were calculated applying 2 deconvolution methods, standard and block-circulant single value decomposition. We used 2 standardized analysis methods, a region of interest–based and a voxel-based analysis, where PET cerebral blood flow masks of |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0039-2499 1524-4628 |
DOI: | 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010246 |