Elevation of the maxillary sinus membrane for de-novo bone formation: First results of a prospective study in humans

Abstract Purpose Sinus floor elevation via the lateral window approach represents a reliable technique for bone augmentation in the atrophic posterior maxilla. It is known that sinus membrane elevation leads to new bone formation. This prospective clinical study compared a specific technique in sinu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery 2015-10, Vol.43 (8), p.1670-1677
Hauptverfasser: Lie, Nynke, Merten, Hans-Albert, Meyns, Joeri, Lethaus, Bernd, Wiltfang, Jörg, Kessler, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Purpose Sinus floor elevation via the lateral window approach represents a reliable technique for bone augmentation in the atrophic posterior maxilla. It is known that sinus membrane elevation leads to new bone formation. This prospective clinical study compared a specific technique in sinus membrane elevation with a conventional sinus floor augmentation (xenogenous/autogenous bone) in a human split mouth model. Methods Five edentulous patients with highly atrophic posterior maxillae were included in this study. On one maxillary side a degradable PDLLA-membrane was placed to create a space underneath the sinus membrane. Contralateral a mixture of autogenous and xenogenous bone was used for sinus floor augmentation. A two-stage procedure was carried out. The following variables were assessed: bone regeneration on cone-beam computed tomography (cone-beam CT), implant success, prosthetic comfort and patient satisfaction. Bone biopsies were taken with simultaneous implant placement. The samples were histologically analyzed. Results Cone-beam CTs revealed new bone formation on both sides. Thirty implants were placed, 15 in the augmented region and 15 in the non-augmented side. Thirty bone biopsies were taken and evaluated. Vital new bone was detected on the experimental side (osteoinductivity). On the conventional side a mixture of autogenous and residual bone substitute material was seen (osteoconductivity). Implant survival was 100% so far. Patient's satisfaction was high and prosthetic complications were not encountered. Conclusion As it provides the highest rate of bone formation, autogenous bone in combination with bone substitute material can be considered as a very reliable standard procedure in sinus floor augmentation. The specific sinus membrane elevation technique as presented here showed satisfying results and might be a suitable alternative for maxillary sinus augmentation.
ISSN:1010-5182
1878-4119
DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2015.07.011