Safety and tolerability of high-dose formoterol (via Aerolizer ®) and salbutamol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
To evaluate the safety and tolerability of high-dose formoterol and salbutamol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this two-way crossover, double-blind, double-dummy study, 17 adults with mild-to-moderate COPD were randomized to receive either formoterol 24 μg (2×12 μg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Respiratory medicine 2006-04, Vol.100 (4), p.666-672 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To evaluate the safety and tolerability of high-dose formoterol and salbutamol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
In this two-way crossover, double-blind, double-dummy study, 17 adults with mild-to-moderate COPD were randomized to receive either formoterol 24
μg (2×12
μg via Aerolizer
®), or salbutamol 600
μg (6×100
μg via metered-dose inhaler), and the appropriate double-dummy q.i.d. at 4-h intervals for 3 consecutive days (total daily dose: 96 and 2400
μg, respectively). After a 4–7-day washout period, patients were switched to the other treatment.
Treatment with high-dose formoterol and salbutamol was equally well tolerated, with no reports of serious adverse events. Both agents were associated with decreased plasma potassium (mean minimum values: 3.4 and 3.3
mmol/l for formoterol and salbutamol, respectively;
P=0.914), increased serum glucose (mean maximum values: 9.0 and 8.7
mmol/l, respectively;
P=0.373), and small increases in mean QTc interval (mean maximum 439
ms with both treatments;
P=0.813). No clinically relevant between-treatment differences in adverse events or laboratory values occurred. Both drugs improved lung function (mean maximum forced expiratory volume in 1
s [FEV
1] 2.6
l with both treatments;
P=0.624), with the improvement being significantly greater with formoterol than with salbutamol on all 3 days of treatment (mean area under the curve [AUC](0–24
h) of FEV
1 formoterol vs. salbutamol on days 1–3, all
P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0954-6111 1532-3064 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.07.017 |