An Extended Charge Equilibration Method

We present a method for estimating partial atomic charges that uses all of the measured ionization energies (first, second, third, etc.) for every atom in the periodic table. We build on the charge equilibration (Qeq) method of Rappé and Goddard (which used only the first ionization energies) but r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of physical chemistry letters 2012-09, Vol.3 (17), p.2506-2511
Hauptverfasser: Wilmer, Christopher E, Kim, Ki Chul, Snurr, Randall Q
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We present a method for estimating partial atomic charges that uses all of the measured ionization energies (first, second, third, etc.) for every atom in the periodic table. We build on the charge equilibration (Qeq) method of Rappé and Goddard (which used only the first ionization energies) but reduce the number of ad hoc parameters from at least one for every type of atom to just two global parameters: a dielectric strength and a modified parameter for hydrogen atoms. Periodic electrostatic interactions are calculated via Ewald sums, and the partial charges are determined by simultaneously solving a system of linear equations; no iteration is required. We compare the predicted partial atomic charges of this extended charge equilibration (EQeq) scheme against plane-wave density-functional theory derived charges determined via the REPEAT method for 12 diverse metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). We also compare EQeq charges against ChelpG charges calculated using nonperiodic MOF fragments, as well as against Qeq charges as implemented in Accelrys Materials Studio. We demonstrate that for the purpose of ranking MOFs from best to worst for carbon capture applications, EQeq charges perform as well as charges derived from electrostatic potentials, but EQeq requires only a tiny fraction of the computational cost (seconds vs days for the MOFs studied). The source code for the EQeq algorithm is provided.
ISSN:1948-7185
1948-7185
DOI:10.1021/jz3008485