Fast oscillatory dynamics during language comprehension: Unification versus maintenance and prediction?
•Review of beta and gamma oscillatory neuronal dynamics during language comprehension.•Interpret this literature within a unification framework.•Propose a maintenance/prediction framework to account for most of the current data.•Suggest some ways to test and compare the two interpretation frameworks...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Brain and language 2015-09, Vol.148, p.51-63 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Review of beta and gamma oscillatory neuronal dynamics during language comprehension.•Interpret this literature within a unification framework.•Propose a maintenance/prediction framework to account for most of the current data.•Suggest some ways to test and compare the two interpretation frameworks.
The role of neuronal oscillations during language comprehension is not yet well understood. In this paper we review and reinterpret the functional roles of beta- and gamma-band oscillatory activity during language comprehension at the sentence and discourse level. We discuss the evidence in favor of a role for beta and gamma in unification (the unification hypothesis), and in light of mounting evidence that cannot be accounted for under this hypothesis, we explore an alternative proposal linking beta and gamma oscillations to maintenance and prediction (respectively) during language comprehension. Our maintenance/prediction hypothesis is able to account for most of the findings that are currently available relating beta and gamma oscillations to language comprehension, and is in good agreement with other proposals about the roles of beta and gamma in domain-general cognitive processing. In conclusion we discuss proposals for further testing and comparing the prediction and unification hypotheses. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0093-934X 1090-2155 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.01.003 |