Superior Mesenteric Artery Margin of Posttherapy Pancreaticoduodenectomy and Prognosis in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Negative-margin resection is crucial to favorable prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. However, the definition of a negative superior mesenteric artery margin (SMAM) varies. The College of American Pathologists defines positive SMAM as the presence of tumor cells at the margi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgical pathology 2015-10, Vol.39 (10), p.1395-1403
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Li, Katz, Matthew H, Lee, Sun M, Fischer, Laurice K, Prakash, Laura, Parker, Nathan, Wang, Hua, Varadhachary, Gauri R, Wolff, Robert A, Lee, Jeffrey E, Pisters, Peter W, Maitra, Anirban, Fleming, Jason B, Estrella, Jeannelyn, Rashid, Asif, Wang, Huamin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Negative-margin resection is crucial to favorable prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. However, the definition of a negative superior mesenteric artery margin (SMAM) varies. The College of American Pathologists defines positive SMAM as the presence of tumor cells at the margin, whereas the European protocol is based on a 1 mm clearance. In this study, we examined the prognostic significance of the SMAM distance in 411 consecutive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients who completed neoadjuvant therapy and pancreaticoduodenectomy. Per College of American Pathologists criteria, 32 (7.8%) had positive margins, and 379 (92.2%) had negative margins. Among margin-negative group, SMAM was ≤1, 1.0 to 5.0, and >5.0 mm in 66, 145, and 168 patients, respectively. There was no difference in either disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) between the positive-margin group and SMAM≤1 mm (P>0.05). However, patients with SMAM 1.0 to 5.0 mm had better OS than those with positive margins or SMAM≤1 mm (P=0.02). Patients with SMAM>5.0 mm had better DFS and OS than those with SMAM 1.0 to 5.0 mm and those with positive margins or SMAM≤1 mm (P
ISSN:0147-5185
1532-0979
DOI:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000491