Percutaneous Acetabuloplasty Compared With Open Reconstruction for Extensive Periacetabular Carcinoma Metastases

Abstract For destructive metastatic periacetabular disease, options include open acetabular reconstruction or percutaneous cement acetabuloplasty (PA). We reviewed 28 consecutive patients with Harrington grade II or III lesions, 17 who underwent Harrington-type or anti-protrusio reconstruction and 1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2015-09, Vol.30 (9), p.1586-1591
Hauptverfasser: Colman, Matthew W., MD, Karim, Syed M., BS, Hirsch, Joshua A., MD, Yoo, Albert J., MD, Schwab, Joseph H., MD, Hornicek, Francis J., MD, PhD, Raskin, Kevin A., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract For destructive metastatic periacetabular disease, options include open acetabular reconstruction or percutaneous cement acetabuloplasty (PA). We reviewed 28 consecutive patients with Harrington grade II or III lesions, 17 who underwent Harrington-type or anti-protrusio reconstruction and 11 who underwent PA. Primary outcome measures were performance status (PS), ambulatory status (0 = unassisted ambulation, 1 = assisted ambulation, 2 = nonambulatory), and 10-point VAS score. The surgery group had better pain reduction than the PA group at 3 months (3.6 vs. 1.5 points, P = 0.04), and a trend at final follow-up (3.8 vs. 1.4 points, P = 0.06). Improvement in ambulatory status was better in the surgery group at 3 months only (0.53 vs. − 0.14, P = 0.03). Thus compared with PA, open reconstruction may provide improved pain relief and ambulation.
ISSN:0883-5403
1532-8406
DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.022