Quantifying the Burden of Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Infection

Abstract Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents substantial clinical and economic burdens. This study evaluated patient and procedure characteristics and resource utilization associated with revision arthroplasty for PJI. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (Q4 2005–2010) was analyzed for 235,8...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2015-09, Vol.30 (9), p.1492-1497
Hauptverfasser: Kamath, Atul F., MD, Ong, Kevin L., PhD, Lau, Edmund, MS, Chan, Vanessa, MPH, Vail, Thomas P., MD, Rubash, Harry E., MD, Berry, Daniel J., MD, Bozic, Kevin J., MD, MBA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents substantial clinical and economic burdens. This study evaluated patient and procedure characteristics and resource utilization associated with revision arthroplasty for PJI. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (Q4 2005–2010) was analyzed for 235,857 revision THA (RTHA) and 301,718 revision TKA (RTKA) procedures.  PJI was the most common indication for RTKA, and the third most common reason for RTHA. PJI was most commonly associated with major severity of illness (SOI) in RTHA, and with moderate SOI in RTKA. RTHA and RTKA for PJI had the longest length of stay. Costs were higher for RTHA/RTKA for PJI than for any other diagnosis except periprosthetic fracture. Epidemiologic differences exist in the rank, severity and populations for RTHA and RTKA for PJI.
ISSN:0883-5403
1532-8406
DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.035