Comparison between modified Dixon MRI techniques, MR spectroscopic relaxometry, and different histologic quantification methods in the assessment of hepatic steatosis

Objectives To compare systematically quantitative MRI, MR spectroscopy (MRS), and different histological methods for liver fat quantification in order to identify possible incongruities. Methods Fifty-nine consecutive patients with liver disorders were examined on a 3 T MRI system. Quantitative MRI...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2015-10, Vol.25 (10), p.2869-2879
Hauptverfasser: Kukuk, Guido M., Hittatiya, Kanishka, Sprinkart, Alois M., Eggers, Holger, Gieseke, Jürgen, Block, Wolfgang, Moeller, Philipp, Willinek, Winfried A., Spengler, Ulrich, Trebicka, Jonel, Fischer, Hans-Peter, Schild, Hans H., Träber, Frank
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To compare systematically quantitative MRI, MR spectroscopy (MRS), and different histological methods for liver fat quantification in order to identify possible incongruities. Methods Fifty-nine consecutive patients with liver disorders were examined on a 3 T MRI system. Quantitative MRI was performed using a dual- and a six-echo variant of the modified Dixon (mDixon) sequence, calculating proton density fat fraction (PDFF) maps, in addition to single-voxel MRS. Histological fat quantification included estimation of the percentage of hepatocytes containing fat vesicles as well as semi-automatic quantification (qHisto) using tissue quantification software. Results In 33 of 59 patients, the hepatic fat fraction was >5 % as determined by MRS (maximum 45 %, mean 17 %). Dual-echo mDixon yielded systematically lower PDFF values than six-echo mDixon (mean difference 1.0 %; P  
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-015-3703-6