Productivity Improvement in CED Paint Plant by Jig Modification

Productivity Improvement in CED Paint Plant by Jig Modification

CED paint plant capacity is less than assembly production, three assembly line producing 610 wheels per hour maximum. Whereas CED paint plant capacity is just 528 wheels per hour so its leads to productivity loss and dispatch failures, on time delivery failures to customers (OEM).CED paint plant bot...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied Mechanics and Materials 2015-06, Vol.766-767 (Advances in Materials and Manufacturing), p.1159-1167
Hauptverfasser: Vidyasagar, Matta, Kumar, G. Ashok, Balamurugan, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Assembly
Assembly lines
Customers
Failure
Productivity
Tractors
Wheels
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1167
container_issue Advances in Materials and Manufacturing
container_start_page 1159
container_title Applied Mechanics and Materials
container_volume 766-767
creator Vidyasagar, Matta
Kumar, G. Ashok
Balamurugan, S.
description CED paint plant capacity is less than assembly production, three assembly line producing 610 wheels per hour maximum. Whereas CED paint plant capacity is just 528 wheels per hour so its leads to productivity loss and dispatch failures, on time delivery failures to customers (OEM).CED paint plant bottleneck is occurred due to existing JIG design So we should Redesigned Existing MS jig. There are two types of components i)Car wheel Jig (LP-Low pressure) ii)Tractor wheels Jig .Tractor wheel line producing 32 nos per hour that we can load 100%,CED capacity and jig pattern matches with assembly output.
doi_str_mv 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.766-767.1159
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709742072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1709742072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1839-f29f0c7e194d4cda559d5c2781dfac120036b355e51ef5b018a99dc7ad3835fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkF1LwzAYhYMf4Db9DwVvBGnNR_N1JWNOnWy4C70OaZpqxtrOpt3Yvzd1guKdF0l4yeGc8z4AXCOYpBCLm91ul3jjbNW6wpmksu3NeLFIOGMxZzxBiMojMECM4ZinAh-DIYFEEJpyKk--PmAsCWFnYOj9CkKWolQMwO2yqfPOtG7r2n00KzdNvbVlSIlcFU2md9FSuzAs1zrc2T56cm_Ros77Drp1dXUOTgu99vbi-x2B1_vpy-Qxnj8_zCbjeWyQIDIusCyg4RbJNE9NrimVOTWYC5QX2iAMIWEZodRSZAuaQSS0lLnhOu93KDIyAlcH31Dwo7O-VaXzxq5DL1t3XiEOJU8x5DhIL_9IV3XXVKGdQkxwTinGIqgmB5Vpau8bW6hN40rd7BWCqieuAnH1Q1wF4ioQV4F4OFz1xIPL9ODSNrryrTXvv8L-4fMJCeqQ7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1687755228</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Productivity Improvement in CED Paint Plant by Jig Modification</title><source>Scientific.net Journals</source><creator>Vidyasagar, Matta ; Kumar, G. Ashok ; Balamurugan, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vidyasagar, Matta ; Kumar, G. Ashok ; Balamurugan, S.</creatorcontrib><description>CED paint plant capacity is less than assembly production, three assembly line producing 610 wheels per hour maximum. Whereas CED paint plant capacity is just 528 wheels per hour so its leads to productivity loss and dispatch failures, on time delivery failures to customers (OEM).CED paint plant bottleneck is occurred due to existing JIG design So we should Redesigned Existing MS jig. There are two types of components i)Car wheel Jig (LP-Low pressure) ii)Tractor wheels Jig .Tractor wheel line producing 32 nos per hour that we can load 100%,CED capacity and jig pattern matches with assembly output.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-9336</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1662-7482</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 3038354759</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9783038354758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1662-7482</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.766-767.1159</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Zurich: Trans Tech Publications Ltd</publisher><subject>Assembly ; Assembly lines ; Customers ; Failure ; Productivity ; Tractors ; Wheels</subject><ispartof>Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2015-06, Vol.766-767 (Advances in Materials and Manufacturing), p.1159-1167</ispartof><rights>2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Trans Tech Publications Ltd. Jun 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1839-f29f0c7e194d4cda559d5c2781dfac120036b355e51ef5b018a99dc7ad3835fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.scientific.net/Image/TitleCover/3996?width=600</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vidyasagar, Matta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, G. Ashok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balamurugan, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Productivity Improvement in CED Paint Plant by Jig Modification</title><title>Applied Mechanics and Materials</title><description>CED paint plant capacity is less than assembly production, three assembly line producing 610 wheels per hour maximum. Whereas CED paint plant capacity is just 528 wheels per hour so its leads to productivity loss and dispatch failures, on time delivery failures to customers (OEM).CED paint plant bottleneck is occurred due to existing JIG design So we should Redesigned Existing MS jig. There are two types of components i)Car wheel Jig (LP-Low pressure) ii)Tractor wheels Jig .Tractor wheel line producing 32 nos per hour that we can load 100%,CED capacity and jig pattern matches with assembly output.</description><subject>Assembly</subject><subject>Assembly lines</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Tractors</subject><subject>Wheels</subject><issn>1660-9336</issn><issn>1662-7482</issn><issn>1662-7482</issn><isbn>3038354759</isbn><isbn>9783038354758</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkF1LwzAYhYMf4Db9DwVvBGnNR_N1JWNOnWy4C70OaZpqxtrOpt3Yvzd1guKdF0l4yeGc8z4AXCOYpBCLm91ul3jjbNW6wpmksu3NeLFIOGMxZzxBiMojMECM4ZinAh-DIYFEEJpyKk--PmAsCWFnYOj9CkKWolQMwO2yqfPOtG7r2n00KzdNvbVlSIlcFU2md9FSuzAs1zrc2T56cm_Ros77Drp1dXUOTgu99vbi-x2B1_vpy-Qxnj8_zCbjeWyQIDIusCyg4RbJNE9NrimVOTWYC5QX2iAMIWEZodRSZAuaQSS0lLnhOu93KDIyAlcH31Dwo7O-VaXzxq5DL1t3XiEOJU8x5DhIL_9IV3XXVKGdQkxwTinGIqgmB5Vpau8bW6hN40rd7BWCqieuAnH1Q1wF4ioQV4F4OFz1xIPL9ODSNrryrTXvv8L-4fMJCeqQ7A</recordid><startdate>20150608</startdate><enddate>20150608</enddate><creator>Vidyasagar, Matta</creator><creator>Kumar, G. Ashok</creator><creator>Balamurugan, S.</creator><general>Trans Tech Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150608</creationdate><title>Productivity Improvement in CED Paint Plant by Jig Modification</title><author>Vidyasagar, Matta ; Kumar, G. Ashok ; Balamurugan, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1839-f29f0c7e194d4cda559d5c2781dfac120036b355e51ef5b018a99dc7ad3835fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Assembly</topic><topic>Assembly lines</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Tractors</topic><topic>Wheels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vidyasagar, Matta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, G. Ashok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balamurugan, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Applied Mechanics and Materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vidyasagar, Matta</au><au>Kumar, G. Ashok</au><au>Balamurugan, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Productivity Improvement in CED Paint Plant by Jig Modification</atitle><jtitle>Applied Mechanics and Materials</jtitle><date>2015-06-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>766-767</volume><issue>Advances in Materials and Manufacturing</issue><spage>1159</spage><epage>1167</epage><pages>1159-1167</pages><issn>1660-9336</issn><issn>1662-7482</issn><eissn>1662-7482</eissn><isbn>3038354759</isbn><isbn>9783038354758</isbn><abstract>CED paint plant capacity is less than assembly production, three assembly line producing 610 wheels per hour maximum. Whereas CED paint plant capacity is just 528 wheels per hour so its leads to productivity loss and dispatch failures, on time delivery failures to customers (OEM).CED paint plant bottleneck is occurred due to existing JIG design So we should Redesigned Existing MS jig. There are two types of components i)Car wheel Jig (LP-Low pressure) ii)Tractor wheels Jig .Tractor wheel line producing 32 nos per hour that we can load 100%,CED capacity and jig pattern matches with assembly output.</abstract><cop>Zurich</cop><pub>Trans Tech Publications Ltd</pub><doi>10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.766-767.1159</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1660-9336
ispartof Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2015-06, Vol.766-767 (Advances in Materials and Manufacturing), p.1159-1167
issn 1660-9336
1662-7482
1662-7482
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709742072
source Scientific.net Journals
subjects Assembly
Assembly lines
Customers
Failure
Productivity
Tractors
Wheels
title Productivity Improvement in CED Paint Plant by Jig Modification
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T07%3A38%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Productivity%20Improvement%20in%20CED%20Paint%20Plant%20by%20Jig%20Modification&rft.jtitle=Applied%20Mechanics%20and%20Materials&rft.au=Vidyasagar,%20Matta&rft.date=2015-06-08&rft.volume=766-767&rft.issue=Advances%20in%20Materials%20and%20Manufacturing&rft.spage=1159&rft.epage=1167&rft.pages=1159-1167&rft.issn=1660-9336&rft.eissn=1662-7482&rft.isbn=3038354759&rft.isbn_list=9783038354758&rft_id=info:doi/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.766-767.1159&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1709742072%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1687755228&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true