The influence of construction methodology on structural brain network measures: A review

•We surveyed the methodological options of constructing structural brain network.•We summarized the influences of construction methodology on the network measures.•We provided suggestions on the strategy of choosing the most suitable methodology.•Most network measures are sensitive to the constructi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neuroscience methods 2015-09, Vol.253, p.170-182
Hauptverfasser: Qi, Shouliang, Meesters, Stephan, Nicolay, Klaas, Romeny, Bart M. ter Haar, Ossenblok, Pauly
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We surveyed the methodological options of constructing structural brain network.•We summarized the influences of construction methodology on the network measures.•We provided suggestions on the strategy of choosing the most suitable methodology.•Most network measures are sensitive to the construction methodologies.•Methodology choice depends on the study objective and the methodologies’ features. Structural brain networks based on diffusion MRI and tractography show robust attributes such as small-worldness, hierarchical modularity, and rich-club organization. However, there are large discrepancies in the reports about specific network measures. It is hypothesized that these discrepancies result from the influence of construction methodology. We surveyed the methodological options and their influences on network measures. It is found that most network measures are sensitive to the scale of brain parcellation, MRI gradient schemes and orientation model, and the tractography algorithm, which is in accordance with the theoretical analysis of the small-world network model. Different network weighting schemes represent different attributes of brain networks, which makes these schemes incomparable between studies. Methodology choice depends on the specific study objectives and a clear understanding of the pros and cons of a particular methodology. Because there is no way to eliminate these influences, it seems more practical to quantify them, optimize the methodologies, and construct structural brain networks with multiple spatial resolutions, multiple edge densities, and multiple weighting schemes.
ISSN:0165-0270
1872-678X
DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.06.016