Ovarian reserve in women with primary antiphospholipid syndrome

Objective The objective of this paper is to evaluate ovarian reserve in primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) women and the association between ovarian reserve tests and clinical and laboratorial parameters, and anti-corpus luteum antibody (anti-CoL). Methods We screened 85 female patients betwee...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lupus 2014-08, Vol.23 (9), p.862-867
Hauptverfasser: Yamakami, LYS, Serafini, PC, de Araujo, DB, Bonfá, E, Leon, EP, Baracat, EC, Silva, CA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The objective of this paper is to evaluate ovarian reserve in primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) women and the association between ovarian reserve tests and clinical and laboratorial parameters, and anti-corpus luteum antibody (anti-CoL). Methods We screened 85 female patients between 18 to 40 years old with APS. Of these, 67 patients were excluded because of association with other autoimmune diseases (n = 42), contraindication or unwillingness to stop hormonal contraceptive (n = 21), current pregnancy or breastfeeding (n = 3) and previous ovarian surgery (n = 1). Therefore, a cross-sectional study was conducted in 18 PAPS patients and 24 healthy women. They were evaluated at early follicular phase with measurement of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol, and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and sonographic antral follicle count (AFC). Serum measurement of anti-CoL was determined by immunoblot analysis. All analyses were performed after at least six months from the last intake of hormonal contraceptive and resumption of menstruation. Results The mean age was comparable in PAPS and controls (33.0 ± 5.0 vs. 30.4 ± 7.0 years; p = 0.19). Regarding ovarian reserve tests, the frequencies of low AFC (≤10) (56% vs. 22%, p = 0.04) and very low AFC (≤5) (37% vs. 9%, p = 0.04) were significantly higher in PAPS patients than controls. Trends of higher frequencies of reduced (
ISSN:0961-2033
1477-0962
DOI:10.1177/0961203314529468