Hand therapy services for rural and remote residents: Results of a survey of Australian occupational therapists and physiotherapists
Objective The aim of this study was to explore how interventions were provided to meet the needs of rural/remote residents who have had a traumatic hand injury, including the coordination of services between rural/remote and metro/regional therapists. Barriers to providing services, use of technolog...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Australian journal of rural health 2015-04, Vol.23 (2), p.112-121 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
The aim of this study was to explore how interventions were provided to meet the needs of rural/remote residents who have had a traumatic hand injury, including the coordination of services between rural/remote and metro/regional therapists. Barriers to providing services, use of technology and professional support provided to therapists in rural/remote areas were also explored.
Design
Cross‐sectional survey.
Setting
Metropolitan/regional and rural/remote public health facilities in Australia.
Participants
Occupational therapists and physiotherapists who provide hand therapy to rural/remote patients.
Main outcome measure
Quantitative and qualitative questionnaire responses analysed with descriptive statistics and inductive analysis.
Results
There were 64 respondents out of a possible 185. Over half of rural/remote respondents provided initial splinting and exercise prescriptions, and over 85% reported that they continued with exercise protocols. Videoconferencing technology for patient intervention and clinical review was used by 39.1% respondents. Barriers to providing services in rural/remote locations included transport, travelling time, limited staff, and lack of expert knowledge in hand injuries or rural/remote health care. Four major themes emerged from the open‐ended questions: working relationships, patient‐centred care, staff development and education, and rural and remote practice.
Conclusion
The use of technology across Australia to support rural/remote patient intervention requires attention to achieve equity and ease of use. Flexible and realistic goals and interventions should be considered when working with rural/remote patients. A shared care approach between metropolitan/regional and rural/remote therapists can improve understanding of rural/remote issues and provide support to therapists. Further research is recommended to determine the suitability of this approach when providing hand therapy to rural/remote residents. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1038-5282 1440-1584 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ajr.12141 |