The Safety of the Blood Supply — Time to Raise the Bar
To the Editor: In their Perspective article on pathogen-reduction technology (PRT) (May 14 issue), 1 Snyder et al. praise the value of this technology. However, they omit a discussion of concerns about the safety and efficacy of PRT, stating that “Numerous studies demonstrate little substantive nega...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2015-08, Vol.373 (9), p.882-882 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To the Editor:
In their Perspective article on pathogen-reduction technology (PRT) (May 14 issue),
1
Snyder et al. praise the value of this technology. However, they omit a discussion of concerns about the safety and efficacy of PRT, stating that “Numerous studies demonstrate little substantive negative effect from pathogen reduction on plasma proteins or platelets.” A study in the Netherlands was terminated because of increased bleeding complications in the PRT group,
2
and a U.S. study documented five fatal cases of the acute respiratory distress syndrome in the PRT group (1.6%) versus none in the control group.
3
Furthermore, PRT fails to inactivate . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMc1507761 |