Are arthropod communities in cotton really disrupted? An assessment of insecticide regimes and evaluation of the beneficial disruption index

Non-selective chemical control of crop pests disrupts beneficial insects and spiders. For Australian cotton crops, a beneficial disruption index (BDI) has been developed that ranks the impact of different insecticides on beneficial arthropods. To evaluate this index as a measure of natural enemy dis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agriculture, ecosystems & environment ecosystems & environment, 2006-04, Vol.113 (1), p.326-335
Hauptverfasser: Mansfield, S., Dillon, M.L., Whitehouse, M.E.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Non-selective chemical control of crop pests disrupts beneficial insects and spiders. For Australian cotton crops, a beneficial disruption index (BDI) has been developed that ranks the impact of different insecticides on beneficial arthropods. To evaluate this index as a measure of natural enemy disruption, the abundance of beneficial arthropods was monitored in ten conventional and nine INGARD ® Bt cotton fields on ten commercial farms during the 2001–2002 season. Beneficial insects were more abundant in those fields subjected to a more selective insecticide regime (low BDI) than in fields that received broad-spectrum insecticide treatments (high BDI). However spider abundance did not change in relation to insecticide regime. Family composition of spider communities was affected by BDI and crop type (Bt or conventional), whereas family composition of insect communities only showed a trend to be affected by BDI and crop type. This difference may indicate that insects are more uniformly affected by the BDI than spiders. The beneficial disruption index is an effective measure of insecticide impacts on beneficial insects in Australian cotton crops.
ISSN:0167-8809
1873-2305
DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2005.10.012