Validation of boundary layer parameterization schemes in the weather research and forecasting model under the aspect of offshore wind energy applications- Part I: Average wind speed and wind shear

Five different planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes in the weather research and forecasting model have been tested with respect to their capability to model boundary layer parameters relevant for offshore wind deployments. For the year 2005 model simulations based on the Yonsei University, asymmet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wind energy (Chichester, England) England), 2015-05, Vol.18 (5), p.769-782
Hauptverfasser: Krogsæter, O., Reuder, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 782
container_issue 5
container_start_page 769
container_title Wind energy (Chichester, England)
container_volume 18
creator Krogsæter, O.
Reuder, J.
description Five different planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes in the weather research and forecasting model have been tested with respect to their capability to model boundary layer parameters relevant for offshore wind deployments. For the year 2005 model simulations based on the Yonsei University, asymmetric convection model version 2, quasi‐normal scale elimination, Mellor–Yamada–Janjic and Mellor–Yamada–Nakanishi–Niino PBL schemes with weather research and forecasting have been performed for the North Sea and validated against measurements of the Forschungsplattformen in Nord‐ und Ostsee Nr.1 platform. The investigations have been focused on the key parameters 100 m mean wind speed and wind shear expressed by the power law exponent α. All PBL‐schemes are doing well in reproducing averages and average annual statistics of the 100 m wind speed. However, two of the schemes (Yonsei University and Mellor–Yamada–Nakanishi–Niino) overestimate the wind speed above 15 m s−1 systematically. The results for the power law wind profile show a large variability between the models and the observations for different atmospheric stability conditions and also differ a lot from the industry standards. Overall, the Mellor–Yamada–Janjic scheme performs slightly better than the others and is suggested as first choice for marine atmospheric boundary layer simulations without apriori information of atmospheric stability in the region of interest. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/we.1727
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1705068005</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3659975961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5377-42d2e29dff80f8c0a3845be014ba7a2b026361f87ff6acdf76e4edd7a74f12373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10cFu1DAQBuAIgUQpiFewxAEklGI7TpzlVlWlrbRApQKVuFiz9njjksSpnSVsn48Hw7tZcUDiZFv6Zn7bk2UvGT1hlPJ3E54wyeWj7IjRxSJnNReP9_syF1yIp9mzGO8oZZSx-ij7_Q1aZ2B0vifekpXf9AbClrSwxUAGCNDhiME9zCTqBjuMxPVkbJBMCGkJJGBECLoh0BtifUANcXT9mnTeYEtSz4R2BRAH1OMuyVsbmyTJ5FIN9hjWWwLD0Dq9j4o5uYYwkqv35PQnBlgfZGqAZp8zH5sU_Dx7YqGN-OKwHmdfP5x_ObvMl58vrs5Ol7kuCynT8w1HvjDW1tTWmkJRi3KFlIkVSOAryquiYraW1lagjZUVCjRGghSW8UIWx9mbue8Q_P0G46g6FzW2LfToN1ExSUta1ZSWib76h975TejT7RSrpCgkp5wm9XpWOvgYA1o1BNel_1eMqt001YRqN80k385yci1u_8fU7flB57N2ccRffzWEH6qShSzV7acLdb38eLOsv98oWfwBd_GyzA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1674372020</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of boundary layer parameterization schemes in the weather research and forecasting model under the aspect of offshore wind energy applications- Part I: Average wind speed and wind shear</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Krogsæter, O. ; Reuder, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Krogsæter, O. ; Reuder, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Five different planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes in the weather research and forecasting model have been tested with respect to their capability to model boundary layer parameters relevant for offshore wind deployments. For the year 2005 model simulations based on the Yonsei University, asymmetric convection model version 2, quasi‐normal scale elimination, Mellor–Yamada–Janjic and Mellor–Yamada–Nakanishi–Niino PBL schemes with weather research and forecasting have been performed for the North Sea and validated against measurements of the Forschungsplattformen in Nord‐ und Ostsee Nr.1 platform. The investigations have been focused on the key parameters 100 m mean wind speed and wind shear expressed by the power law exponent α. All PBL‐schemes are doing well in reproducing averages and average annual statistics of the 100 m wind speed. However, two of the schemes (Yonsei University and Mellor–Yamada–Nakanishi–Niino) overestimate the wind speed above 15 m s−1 systematically. The results for the power law wind profile show a large variability between the models and the observations for different atmospheric stability conditions and also differ a lot from the industry standards. Overall, the Mellor–Yamada–Janjic scheme performs slightly better than the others and is suggested as first choice for marine atmospheric boundary layer simulations without apriori information of atmospheric stability in the region of interest. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1095-4244</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1824</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/we.1727</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Atmospheric boundary layer ; Boundary layers ; FINO1 ; Forecasting ; marine atmospheric boundary layer ; parameterization ; power law ; Wind power ; Wind shear ; Wind speed ; WRF</subject><ispartof>Wind energy (Chichester, England), 2015-05, Vol.18 (5), p.769-782</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5377-42d2e29dff80f8c0a3845be014ba7a2b026361f87ff6acdf76e4edd7a74f12373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5377-42d2e29dff80f8c0a3845be014ba7a2b026361f87ff6acdf76e4edd7a74f12373</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7214-317X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fwe.1727$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fwe.1727$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krogsæter, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuder, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of boundary layer parameterization schemes in the weather research and forecasting model under the aspect of offshore wind energy applications- Part I: Average wind speed and wind shear</title><title>Wind energy (Chichester, England)</title><addtitle>Wind Energ</addtitle><description>Five different planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes in the weather research and forecasting model have been tested with respect to their capability to model boundary layer parameters relevant for offshore wind deployments. For the year 2005 model simulations based on the Yonsei University, asymmetric convection model version 2, quasi‐normal scale elimination, Mellor–Yamada–Janjic and Mellor–Yamada–Nakanishi–Niino PBL schemes with weather research and forecasting have been performed for the North Sea and validated against measurements of the Forschungsplattformen in Nord‐ und Ostsee Nr.1 platform. The investigations have been focused on the key parameters 100 m mean wind speed and wind shear expressed by the power law exponent α. All PBL‐schemes are doing well in reproducing averages and average annual statistics of the 100 m wind speed. However, two of the schemes (Yonsei University and Mellor–Yamada–Nakanishi–Niino) overestimate the wind speed above 15 m s−1 systematically. The results for the power law wind profile show a large variability between the models and the observations for different atmospheric stability conditions and also differ a lot from the industry standards. Overall, the Mellor–Yamada–Janjic scheme performs slightly better than the others and is suggested as first choice for marine atmospheric boundary layer simulations without apriori information of atmospheric stability in the region of interest. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Atmospheric boundary layer</subject><subject>Boundary layers</subject><subject>FINO1</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>marine atmospheric boundary layer</subject><subject>parameterization</subject><subject>power law</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><subject>Wind shear</subject><subject>Wind speed</subject><subject>WRF</subject><issn>1095-4244</issn><issn>1099-1824</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10cFu1DAQBuAIgUQpiFewxAEklGI7TpzlVlWlrbRApQKVuFiz9njjksSpnSVsn48Hw7tZcUDiZFv6Zn7bk2UvGT1hlPJ3E54wyeWj7IjRxSJnNReP9_syF1yIp9mzGO8oZZSx-ij7_Q1aZ2B0vifekpXf9AbClrSwxUAGCNDhiME9zCTqBjuMxPVkbJBMCGkJJGBECLoh0BtifUANcXT9mnTeYEtSz4R2BRAH1OMuyVsbmyTJ5FIN9hjWWwLD0Dq9j4o5uYYwkqv35PQnBlgfZGqAZp8zH5sU_Dx7YqGN-OKwHmdfP5x_ObvMl58vrs5Ol7kuCynT8w1HvjDW1tTWmkJRi3KFlIkVSOAryquiYraW1lagjZUVCjRGghSW8UIWx9mbue8Q_P0G46g6FzW2LfToN1ExSUta1ZSWib76h975TejT7RSrpCgkp5wm9XpWOvgYA1o1BNel_1eMqt001YRqN80k385yci1u_8fU7flB57N2ccRffzWEH6qShSzV7acLdb38eLOsv98oWfwBd_GyzA</recordid><startdate>201505</startdate><enddate>201505</enddate><creator>Krogsæter, O.</creator><creator>Reuder, J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7214-317X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201505</creationdate><title>Validation of boundary layer parameterization schemes in the weather research and forecasting model under the aspect of offshore wind energy applications- Part I: Average wind speed and wind shear</title><author>Krogsæter, O. ; Reuder, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5377-42d2e29dff80f8c0a3845be014ba7a2b026361f87ff6acdf76e4edd7a74f12373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric boundary layer</topic><topic>Boundary layers</topic><topic>FINO1</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>marine atmospheric boundary layer</topic><topic>parameterization</topic><topic>power law</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><topic>Wind shear</topic><topic>Wind speed</topic><topic>WRF</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krogsæter, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuder, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Wind energy (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krogsæter, O.</au><au>Reuder, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of boundary layer parameterization schemes in the weather research and forecasting model under the aspect of offshore wind energy applications- Part I: Average wind speed and wind shear</atitle><jtitle>Wind energy (Chichester, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Wind Energ</addtitle><date>2015-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>769</spage><epage>782</epage><pages>769-782</pages><issn>1095-4244</issn><eissn>1099-1824</eissn><abstract>Five different planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes in the weather research and forecasting model have been tested with respect to their capability to model boundary layer parameters relevant for offshore wind deployments. For the year 2005 model simulations based on the Yonsei University, asymmetric convection model version 2, quasi‐normal scale elimination, Mellor–Yamada–Janjic and Mellor–Yamada–Nakanishi–Niino PBL schemes with weather research and forecasting have been performed for the North Sea and validated against measurements of the Forschungsplattformen in Nord‐ und Ostsee Nr.1 platform. The investigations have been focused on the key parameters 100 m mean wind speed and wind shear expressed by the power law exponent α. All PBL‐schemes are doing well in reproducing averages and average annual statistics of the 100 m wind speed. However, two of the schemes (Yonsei University and Mellor–Yamada–Nakanishi–Niino) overestimate the wind speed above 15 m s−1 systematically. The results for the power law wind profile show a large variability between the models and the observations for different atmospheric stability conditions and also differ a lot from the industry standards. Overall, the Mellor–Yamada–Janjic scheme performs slightly better than the others and is suggested as first choice for marine atmospheric boundary layer simulations without apriori information of atmospheric stability in the region of interest. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/we.1727</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7214-317X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1095-4244
ispartof Wind energy (Chichester, England), 2015-05, Vol.18 (5), p.769-782
issn 1095-4244
1099-1824
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1705068005
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Atmospheric boundary layer
Boundary layers
FINO1
Forecasting
marine atmospheric boundary layer
parameterization
power law
Wind power
Wind shear
Wind speed
WRF
title Validation of boundary layer parameterization schemes in the weather research and forecasting model under the aspect of offshore wind energy applications- Part I: Average wind speed and wind shear
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T18%3A33%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20boundary%20layer%20parameterization%20schemes%20in%20the%20weather%20research%20and%20forecasting%20model%20under%20the%20aspect%20of%20offshore%20wind%20energy%20applications-%20Part%20I:%20Average%20wind%20speed%20and%20wind%20shear&rft.jtitle=Wind%20energy%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Krogs%C3%A6ter,%20O.&rft.date=2015-05&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=769&rft.epage=782&rft.pages=769-782&rft.issn=1095-4244&rft.eissn=1099-1824&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/we.1727&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3659975961%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1674372020&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true