Predictors of Return to Work in Cancer Survivors in the Royal Air Force

Purpose Return to work (RTW) is beneficial for cancer survivors, employers and society. However, little is known about predictors of RTW in the military environment. Methods A cohort of 194 Royal Air Force (RAF) personnel aged 18–58 who survived primary cancer treatment between 2001 and 2011 were fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of occupational rehabilitation 2015-03, Vol.25 (1), p.153-159
Hauptverfasser: Murray, Kenneth, Lam, Kin Bong Hubert, McLoughlin, David C., Sadhra, Steven S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Return to work (RTW) is beneficial for cancer survivors, employers and society. However, little is known about predictors of RTW in the military environment. Methods A cohort of 194 Royal Air Force (RAF) personnel aged 18–58 who survived primary cancer treatment between 2001 and 2011 were followed up for 18 months. Information was obtained from occupational health and primary care records. Personal, occupational and clinical predictors of RTW were identified by Cox proportional hazards regression. Results The median sickness absence before RTW was 107 days. Six months after diagnosis 54 % of participants had RTW, and reached 80 % by 12 months. Time taken to RTW was predicted by age at diagnosis, rank, trade group, pre-diagnosis sickness absence, site of cancer, treatment modality, and prognosis. RTW at 18 months were predicted by higher rank (HR = 2.31; 95 % CI 1.46–3.65), and having melanoma (9.75; 4.97–19.13). Those receiving chemotherapy were significantly less likely to have RTW compared to other treatment modalities (0.18; 0.10–0.32). Conclusions Rank, cancer diagnostic group, and treatment modality are the most important predictors of RTW in cancer survivors in the RAF. These predictors can be used to inform rehabilitation programmes and decisions on RTW.
ISSN:1053-0487
1573-3688
DOI:10.1007/s10926-014-9516-7