Comparison of magnetic resonance concentration measurements in water to temperature measurements in compressible air flows

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements in liquid flows provide highly detailed 3D mean velocity and concentration data in complex turbulent mixing flow applications. The scalar transport analogy is applied to infer the mean temperature distribution in high speed gas flows directly from the MRI concentration measurements in liquid. Compressibility effects on turbulent mixing are known to be weak for simple flows at high subsonic Mach number, and it was not known if this would hold in more complex flows characteristic of practical applications. Furthermore, the MRI measurements are often done at lower Reynolds number than the compressible application, although both are generally done in fully turbulent flows. The hypothesis is that the conclusions from MRI measurements performed in water are transferable to high subsonic Mach number applications. The present experiment is designed to compare stagnation temperature measurements in high speed airflow ( M = 0.7) to concentration measurements in an identical water flow apparatus. The flow configuration was a low aspect ratio wall jet with a thick splitter plate producing a 3D complex downstream flow mixing the wall-jet fluid with the mainstream flow. The three-dimensional velocity field is documented using magnetic resonance velocimetry in the water experiment, and the mixing is quantified by measuring the mean concentration distribution of wall-jet fluid marked with dissolved copper sulfate. The airflow experiments are operated with a temperature difference between the main stream and the wall jet. Profiles of the stagnation temperature are measured with a shielded thermocouple probe. The results show excellent agreement between normalized temperature and concentration profiles after correction of the temperature measurements for the effects of energy separation. The agreement is within 1 % near the edges of the mixing layer, which suggests that the mixing characteristics of the large scale turbulence structures are the same in the two flows.