Multilayer Architectures for Facial Action Unit Recognition

In expression recognition and many other computer vision applications, the recognition performance is greatly improved by adding a layer of nonlinear texture filters between the raw input pixels and the classifier. The function of this layer is typically known as feature extraction. Popular filter t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on systems, man and cybernetics. Part B, Cybernetics man and cybernetics. Part B, Cybernetics, 2012-08, Vol.42 (4), p.1027-1038
Hauptverfasser: Tingfan Wu, Butko, N. J., Ruvolo, P., Whitehill, J., Bartlett, M. S., Movellan, J. R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In expression recognition and many other computer vision applications, the recognition performance is greatly improved by adding a layer of nonlinear texture filters between the raw input pixels and the classifier. The function of this layer is typically known as feature extraction. Popular filter types for this layer are Gabor energy filters (GEFs) and local binary patterns (LBPs). Recent work [1] suggests that adding a second layer of nonlinear filters on top of the first layer may be beneficial. However, it is unclear what is the best architecture of layers and selection of filters. In this paper, we present a thorough empirical analysis of the performance of single-layer and dual-layer texture-based approaches for action unit recognition. For the single hidden layer case, GEFs perform consistently better than LBPs, which may be due to their robustness to jitter and illumination noise as well as to their ability to encode texture at multiple resolutions. For dual-layer case, we confirm that, while small, the benefit of adding this second layer is reliable and consistent across data sets. Interestingly for this second layer, LBPs appear to perform better than GEFs.
ISSN:1083-4419
1941-0492
DOI:10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2195170