The Cost–Utility of Total Hip Arthroplasty: Earlier Intervention, Improved Economics

Abstract We estimated the cost of Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years gained according to preoperative disease severity. We studied 159 primary unilateral THA, mean follow-up: 4 years. A median split of preoperative WOMAC scores was done to set apart a low (better) and a high (worse) score group. The groups...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2015-06, Vol.30 (6), p.945-949
Hauptverfasser: Lavernia, Carlos J., MD, Iacobelli, David A., MD, Brooks, Larry, PhD, Villa, Jesus M., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract We estimated the cost of Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years gained according to preoperative disease severity. We studied 159 primary unilateral THA, mean follow-up: 4 years. A median split of preoperative WOMAC scores was done to set apart a low (better) and a high (worse) score group. The groups with worse preoperative WOMAC were consistently associated with a less cost-effective intervention. The highest mean cost-effectiveness was achieved by patients with better WOMAC-total ($8256.32/QALY-gained). As patients aged, the cost-effectiveness of THA decreased. Patients 75 years of age or older and with worse scores had the least cost-effective interventions ($25,937.33/QALY-gained). THA remains a very cost-effective intervention even when performed in older “sicker” patients. Waiting for the patient to deteriorate will make the intervention more “expensive”.
ISSN:0883-5403
1532-8406
DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2014.12.028