Diagnostic accuracy of the soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/placental growth factor ratio for preeclampsia: a meta-analysis based on 20 studies

Purpose To investigate the accuracy of the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1(sFlt-1)/placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio to predict preeclampsia (PE). Methods A search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted for human studies without language restriction. We included the studies...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2015-09, Vol.292 (3), p.507-518
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Yuxiu, Zhao, Yang, Yu, Ailing, Zhao, Bin, Gao, Yufang, Niu, Haitao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To investigate the accuracy of the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1(sFlt-1)/placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio to predict preeclampsia (PE). Methods A search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted for human studies without language restriction. We included the studies reported sufficient data to reconstruct the diagnostic 2 × 2 table of sFlt-1/PlGF with testing of PlGF and sFlt-1 in serum or plasma. Two reviewers independently screened the articles. Disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Unpublished data were requested from the authors of the study by email. Results Twenty studies with 28 groups of women with different gestational ages were included in our study. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of sFlt-1/PlGF were 0.78 and 0.84 with the area under the SROC curve (AUC) of 0.88. In subgroup analyses, the diagnostic value of sFlt-1/PlGF for early-onset PE is highest with a pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 241 and AUC of 0.98. Conclusions The accuracy of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for screening PE was moderate and was high for early-onset PE. High-quality studies are needed to confirm their usefulness in prediction of PE in clinical practice.
ISSN:0932-0067
1432-0711
DOI:10.1007/s00404-015-3671-8