A Preprocedural Checklist Improves the Safety of Emergency Department Intubation of Trauma Patients

Objectives Endotracheal intubation of trauma patients is a vital and high‐risk procedure in the emergency department (ED). The hypothesis was that implementation of a standardized, preprocedural checklist would improve the safety of this procedure. Methods A preprocedural intubation checklist was de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic emergency medicine 2015-08, Vol.22 (8), p.989-992
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Kurt A., High, Kevin, Collins, Sean P., Self, Wesley H., Reardon, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives Endotracheal intubation of trauma patients is a vital and high‐risk procedure in the emergency department (ED). The hypothesis was that implementation of a standardized, preprocedural checklist would improve the safety of this procedure. Methods A preprocedural intubation checklist was developed and then implemented in a prospective pre‐/postinterventional study in an academic trauma center ED. The proportions of trauma patients older than 16 years who experienced intubation‐related complications during the 6 months before checklist implementation and 6 months after implementation were compared. Intubation‐related complications included oxygen desaturation, emesis, esophageal intubation, hypotension, and cardiac arrest. Additional outcomes included time from paralysis to intubation and adherence to safety process measures. Results During the study, 141 trauma patients were intubated, including 76 in the prechecklist period and 65 in the postchecklist period. A lower proportion of patients experienced intubation‐related complications in the postchecklist period (1.5%) than the prechecklist period (9.2%), representing a 7.7% (95% confidence interval = 0.5% to 14.8%) absolute risk reduction. Paralysis‐to‐intubation time was also lower in the postchecklist period (median = 82 seconds, interquartile range [IQR] = 68 to 101 seconds) compared to the prechecklist period (median = 94 seconds, IQR = 78 to 115 seconds; p = 0.02). Adherence to safety process measures also improved, with all safety measures performed in 69.2% in the postchecklist period compared to 17.1% before the checklist (p 
ISSN:1069-6563
1553-2712
DOI:10.1111/acem.12717