Effects of Duodenal-Jejunal Bypass Liner (EndoBarrier®) on Gastric Emptying in Obese and Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Introduction The duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) is a promising technique for treating obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, despite promising results, its mechanism of action has not been elucidated. It is thought to promote changes in gastric emptying owing to the neuro-endocr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obesity surgery 2015-09, Vol.25 (9), p.1618-1625
Hauptverfasser: de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux, Lopes, Guilherme Sauniti, da Costa Martins, Bruno, Orso, Ivan Roberto Bonotto, Coutinho, Artur Martins Novaes, de Oliveira, Suzana Lopes, Sakai, Paulo, dos Passos Galvão-Neto, Manoel, Santo, Marco Aurélio, Sapienza, Marcelo Tatit, Cecconello, Ivan, Buchpiguel, Carlos Alberto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction The duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) is a promising technique for treating obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, despite promising results, its mechanism of action has not been elucidated. It is thought to promote changes in gastric emptying owing to the neuro-endocrine axis. Objective The aim of this paper was to study DJBL-induced changes in gastric emptying and the relationship of those changes with weight loss and T2DM. Methods Twenty-five patients with obesity and T2DM met inclusion criteria. Scintigraphic gastric emptying testing was performed prior to implantation, 16 weeks after implantation, and 4 weeks after removal. The average gastric retention was compared between tests, to examine the relationship between gastric emptying and those who lost more than 10 % of total body weight. Similarly, we compared average gastric retention between those who achieved a glycated hemoglobin target lower than 7 %. Results Average gastric retention was greater after DJBL implantation compared with the baseline (first hour, 74 ± 16.3 %, p  = 0.001; second hour, 45 ± 25 %, p  
ISSN:0960-8923
1708-0428
DOI:10.1007/s11695-015-1594-x