Dynamic modeling and simulation of an alembic pear wine distillation

•The traditional alembic has been modeled as a two equilibrium stage system.•The liquid phase can be treated as a quasi-binary mixture.•Thermodynamic properties can be calculated independently of congener concentrations.•Activity coefficients can be predicted for most congeners with the UNIFAC metho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food and bioproducts processing 2013-10, Vol.91 (4), p.447-456
Hauptverfasser: Sacher, Johannes, García-Llobodanin, Laura, López, Francisco, Segura, Hugo, Pérez-Correa, José Ricardo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•The traditional alembic has been modeled as a two equilibrium stage system.•The liquid phase can be treated as a quasi-binary mixture.•Thermodynamic properties can be calculated independently of congener concentrations.•Activity coefficients can be predicted for most congeners with the UNIFAC method.•Ethanol and 15 congeners in the distillate for a pear spirit were well predicted. In this research a phase equilibrium model to predict the recovery of several aroma compounds in spirits distilled in a traditional Charentais alembic has been developed. Due to the congeners’ quasi-infinite dilution, the properties of the mixture are assumed to be dependent on the ethanol mole fraction only. Thus, the system is treated as a quasi-binary mixture; the ethanol recovery, the dynamics of the condensation and the heat transfer processes are modeled independently of the congener's concentration. The model was calibrated with laboratory data obtained during the elaboration of pear distillates. The concentration of ethanol and 15 congeners in the distillate were measured with gas chromatography during the experiments. Fitting just two parameters, one for heating power and one for heat loss, was sufficient to reproduce the experimental ethanol recovery curves. This allowed an accurate prediction of most of the congener's recovery curves. The prediction of the concentration of five congeners, including acetaldehyde and methanol, are not significantly different from measured values. The prediction of the concentration of six congeners was biased but with relatively small errors (ranging between 8% and 25%). Significantly large prediction biases (more than 30%) were observed for ethyl hexanoate, ethyl decanoate and phenethyl alcohol.
ISSN:0960-3085
1744-3571
DOI:10.1016/j.fbp.2013.04.001