Validation of the Japanese version of HFS-14, a disease-specific quality of life scale for patients suffering from hand-foot syndrome

Purpose The purpose of this study was to develop a Japanese version of hand-foot syndrome (HFS)-specific quality of life (QOL) questionnaire (HFS-14) to evaluate and monitor the QOL of patients with a possibility of HFS. Methods The original English version of HFS-14 was translated and slightly modi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2015-09, Vol.23 (9), p.2739-2745
Hauptverfasser: Mikoshiba, Naoko, Yamamoto-Mitani, Noriko, Sato, Kazuki, Asaoka, Yoshinari, Ohki, Takamasa, Ohata, Misato, Miyashita, Mitsunori
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose The purpose of this study was to develop a Japanese version of hand-foot syndrome (HFS)-specific quality of life (QOL) questionnaire (HFS-14) to evaluate and monitor the QOL of patients with a possibility of HFS. Methods The original English version of HFS-14 was translated and slightly modified into Japanese, and the Japanese HFS-14 was administered to 187 patients receiving chemotherapy with high risk of developing HFS as outpatients in four institutions in Japan. Factor validity, internal consistency, correlation with the Skindex-16 and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores, known group validity, and test-retest reliability were analyzed for 105 patients who developed HFS. Next, we compared HFS-14 with DLQI and Skindex-16. Results Factor analysis confirmed the factor structure (one putative scale) of the Japanese HFS-14. Cronbach’s alpha was over 0.90. The Japanese HFS-14 score was correlated with the Skindex-16 and DLQI score. Intra-class correlation coefficients were over 0.80. Patients with severe HFS reported significantly poorer HFS-14 score than those with mild HFS. The Skindex-16 and DLQI scores were also significantly different in patients with different Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grades, but with smaller effect sizes than those for the HFS-14 score. Conclusions The Japanese HFS-14 provides a valid and reliable score for monitoring and evaluating HFS.
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-015-2638-4