Science, critical race theory and colour-blindness
Ironically, critical analyses of science remain underemphasized within the field of Critical Race Theory (CRT). Instead, CRT sees science as one site among many, e.g., education, criminal justice, housing, employment, a perspective that routinely overlooks the continuing significance of science. In...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The British journal of sociology 2015-03, Vol.66 (1), p.46-52 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Ironically, critical analyses of science remain underemphasized within the field of Critical Race Theory (CRT). Instead, CRT sees science as one site among many, e.g., education, criminal justice, housing, employment, a perspective that routinely overlooks the continuing significance of science. In this context, placing critical analyses of science in dialogue with Critical Race Theory might benefit both areas of inquiry. Duster's 'Post-genomic surprise' (2015) is situated in a thought-provoking theoretical border space, offering suggestions for articulations between both areas. Bringing critical analyses of science in closer alignment with Critical Race Theory might enrich the interpretive frameworks of both areas. Toward this end, here I sketch out several implications of Duster's arguments. Adapted from the source document. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-1315 1468-4446 1468-4446 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1468-4446.12117_3 |