Science, critical race theory and colour-blindness

Ironically, critical analyses of science remain underemphasized within the field of Critical Race Theory (CRT). Instead, CRT sees science as one site among many, e.g., education, criminal justice, housing, employment, a perspective that routinely overlooks the continuing significance of science. In...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The British journal of sociology 2015-03, Vol.66 (1), p.46-52
1. Verfasser: Collins, Patricia Hill
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Ironically, critical analyses of science remain underemphasized within the field of Critical Race Theory (CRT). Instead, CRT sees science as one site among many, e.g., education, criminal justice, housing, employment, a perspective that routinely overlooks the continuing significance of science. In this context, placing critical analyses of science in dialogue with Critical Race Theory might benefit both areas of inquiry. Duster's 'Post-genomic surprise' (2015) is situated in a thought-provoking theoretical border space, offering suggestions for articulations between both areas. Bringing critical analyses of science in closer alignment with Critical Race Theory might enrich the interpretive frameworks of both areas. Toward this end, here I sketch out several implications of Duster's arguments. Adapted from the source document.
ISSN:0007-1315
1468-4446
1468-4446
DOI:10.1111/1468-4446.12117_3