Carotid Plaque Morphological Classification Compared With Biomechanical Cap Stress: Implications for a Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Based Assessment

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE—Two approaches to target plaque vulnerability—a histopathologic classification scheme and a biomechanical analysis—were compared and the implications for noninvasive risk stratification of carotid plaques using magnetic resonance imaging were assessed. METHODS—Seventy-five his...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Stroke (1970) 2015-08, Vol.46 (8), p.2124-2128
Hauptverfasser: Gijsen, Frank J.H, Nieuwstadt, Harm A, Wentzel, Jolanda J, Verhagen, Hence J.M, van der Lugt, Aad, van der Steen, Antonius F.W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE—Two approaches to target plaque vulnerability—a histopathologic classification scheme and a biomechanical analysis—were compared and the implications for noninvasive risk stratification of carotid plaques using magnetic resonance imaging were assessed. METHODS—Seventy-five histological plaque cross sections were obtained from carotid endarterectomy specimens from 34 patients (>70% stenosis) and subjected to both a Virmani histopathologic classification (thin fibrous cap atheroma with 300 kPa and classified as a thin fibrous cap atheroma). Twenty-eight of 50 plaque cross sections could be labeled as low-risk (a peak cap stress
ISSN:0039-2499
1524-4628
DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009707