Prognostic role of LDL cholesterol in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease: Multicenter prospective study in Italy

Abstract Background and aims The prognostic role of LDL in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) is still undefined. We addressed this question in a multicenter prospective study including patients referred to nephrologist for management. Methods and results 1306 patients with CKD stage III–V we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases, 2015-08, Vol.25 (8), p.756-762
Hauptverfasser: De Nicola, Luca, Provenzano, Michele, Chiodini, Paolo, D'Arrigo, Graziella, Tripepi, Giovanni, Del Vecchio, Lucia, Conte, Giuseppe, Locatelli, Francesco, Zoccali, Carmine, Minutolo, Roberto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background and aims The prognostic role of LDL in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) is still undefined. We addressed this question in a multicenter prospective study including patients referred to nephrologist for management. Methods and results 1306 patients with CKD stage III–V were studied at basal visit in 79 Italian nephrology clinics in 2004–2006, and then followed for survival analyses. Study endpoints were incident cardiovascular -CV events (fatal and major non-fatal) and renal events (start of renal replacement therapy or eGFR halving). Mean age was 67.6 ± 11.8 years, male 65%, diabetes 25%, CV disease 27%, and eGFR 35.8 ± 12.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 . LDL was 119 ± 40 mg/dL, with high levels in 50.1% and 82.8% defined on the basis of the individual CV risk profile estimated according to ATPIII 2001 and ESC 2012 guidelines (LDL 100 to 160, and >70 or >100 mg/dL, respectively). Over a median follow up of 2.87 years, 178 CV and 181 renal events occurred. At multivariable Cox analyses, CV risk linearly increased with higher LDL (hazard ratio-HR per 40 mg/dL higher LDL: 1.20, 95% confidence intervals-CI 1.03–1.39); risk doubled when considering high LDL defined according to ESC 2012 (HR 2.37, 95%CI 1.39–4.03) while this association was not significant when considering the higher threshold levels of ATPIII 2001 (HR 1.10, 95%CI 0.82–1.49). No association emerged between LDL and renal risk. Conclusion In non-dialysis CKD patients, CV risk increases linearly with higher LDL and is more than doubled when considering the lower threshold values currently indicated for defining optimal LDL level.
ISSN:0939-4753
1590-3729
DOI:10.1016/j.numecd.2015.04.001