Cost of Treating Venous Thromboembolism With Heparin and Warfarin Versus Home Treatment With Rivaroxaban

Background Target‐specific anticoagulants such as rivaroxaban facilitate immediate discharge of low‐risk venous thromboembolism (VTE; including deep vein thrombosis [DVT] and pulmonary embolism [PE]) allowing treatment at home instead of hospitalization. Objectives The objective was to compare costs accrued over 6 months by patients diagnosed with low‐risk VTE and treated at home with rivaroxaban versus usual care with heparin‐warfarin. Methods This case‐control study calculated costs using the established charge‐to‐cost ratio from UB‐04 billing claims of patients diagnosed at two metropolitan hospitals. Patients were defined as low risk by the Hestia criteria. All patients were anticoagulated for 6 months. Control patients were treated with usual care using low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) and then warfarin. Case patients were treated with an initial dose of rivaroxaban in the ED followed by same‐day discharge home with rivaroxaban. Medians were compared by Mann‐Whitney U‐test. Results Fifty cases and 47 controls were identified. Groups were well matched according to mean age, Charlson comorbidity score, and proportions by sex and location of thrombus. For all VTEs, median hospital charges for 6 months after diagnosis were $11,128 (interquartile range [IQR] = $8,110 to $23,390) for controls, compared with $4,787 (IQR = $3,042 to $7,596) for cases (Mann‐Whitney U‐test p