The 21st-Century Turn to Culture: American Exceptionalism
The U.S. Military's turn to culture in the 21st century occurred largely because of its inability to achieve its stated objectives in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan through conventional military force. Building on a long history of military strategies concerned with the cultural differences o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of Middle East studies 2014-11, Vol.46 (4), p.794-796 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 796 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 794 |
container_title | International journal of Middle East studies |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Davis, Rochelle |
description | The U.S. Military's turn to culture in the 21st century occurred largely because of its inability to achieve its stated objectives in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan through conventional military force. Building on a long history of military strategies concerned with the cultural differences of others, the U.S. military crafted a warfighting strategy in 2006 based on a counterinsurgency (COIN) doctrine of using cultural knowledge to battle the enemy. Charting how and why culture was embraced as a 21st-century “weapons system” shows us how technopolitical systems inside the military-industrial complex are envisioned, built, and then dismantled. Close tracking of these changing 21st-century strategies of war reveals, deep within the counterterrorism discourse, a fundamental belief in American exceptionalism. The principle that emerged from this ideological environment is that the enemies to be fought are not only terrorists or the ideologues of al-Qaʿida but also the countries and cultures that produced them. The implementation of this principle, despite its obvious failures, reveals the ideological underpinning that has justified the incredible destruction and securitized implementation of warfighting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0020743814001111 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1695988918</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0020743814001111</cupid><jstor_id>43303231</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43303231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-a7c50f1f602e217d1fb6344de53a55be89d98d5d4ade10d7e266665522db1b343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUlLBDEQhYMoOC4_wIPQ4MVLa1X2eJPBDQQPjucm3UlrD72MSTfovzfDiIgiWJeieN97RVKEHCGcIaA6fwSgoDjTyAEw1RaZIVeYS6Zhm8zWcr7Wd8lejEsAMILqGTGLF59RjGM-9_04hfdsMYU-G4dsPrVp9hfZZedDU9k-u3qr_Gpsht62TewOyE5t2-gPP_s-ebq-Wsxv8_uHm7v55X1ecanH3KpKQI21BOopKod1KRnnzgtmhSi9Ns5oJxy3ziM45alMJQSlrsSScbZPTje5qzC8Tj6ORdfEyret7f0wxQKlEUZrg_ofqFRGMKXgfygzFDChJz_Q5ZD-KL05UWCo1JKbROGGqsIQY_B1sQpNZ8N7gVCsT1T8OlHyHG88yzgO4cvAGQNG2Vpnn5m2K0Pjnv231X-mfgAxw5iL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1609268649</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The 21st-Century Turn to Culture: American Exceptionalism</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Davis, Rochelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Rochelle</creatorcontrib><description>The U.S. Military's turn to culture in the 21st century occurred largely because of its inability to achieve its stated objectives in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan through conventional military force. Building on a long history of military strategies concerned with the cultural differences of others, the U.S. military crafted a warfighting strategy in 2006 based on a counterinsurgency (COIN) doctrine of using cultural knowledge to battle the enemy. Charting how and why culture was embraced as a 21st-century “weapons system” shows us how technopolitical systems inside the military-industrial complex are envisioned, built, and then dismantled. Close tracking of these changing 21st-century strategies of war reveals, deep within the counterterrorism discourse, a fundamental belief in American exceptionalism. The principle that emerged from this ideological environment is that the enemies to be fought are not only terrorists or the ideologues of al-Qaʿida but also the countries and cultures that produced them. The implementation of this principle, despite its obvious failures, reveals the ideological underpinning that has justified the incredible destruction and securitized implementation of warfighting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7438</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0020743814001111</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJMECN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>21st century ; Afghanistan ; Afghanistan War ; Armed Forces ; Central Asian culture ; Counterinsurgency ; Counterterrorism ; Crosscultural Differences ; Cultural differences ; Discourse ; Exceptionalism ; Ideology ; Implementation ; Invasion ; Iraq ; Iraq War-2003 ; Knowledge ; Law ; Military culture ; Military history ; Military strategy ; Military training ; Military-Industrial Complex ; Officer training ; Petraeus, David H ; Roundtable ; Simulation training ; Terrorism ; Terrorists ; The Technopolitics of War in the 20th and 21st Centuries ; Twenty First Century ; U.S.A ; War ; Weapons</subject><ispartof>International journal of Middle East studies, 2014-11, Vol.46 (4), p.794-796</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-a7c50f1f602e217d1fb6344de53a55be89d98d5d4ade10d7e266665522db1b343</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43303231$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020743814001111/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,12845,27924,27925,33775,55628,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Rochelle</creatorcontrib><title>The 21st-Century Turn to Culture: American Exceptionalism</title><title>International journal of Middle East studies</title><addtitle>Int. J. Middle East Stud</addtitle><description>The U.S. Military's turn to culture in the 21st century occurred largely because of its inability to achieve its stated objectives in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan through conventional military force. Building on a long history of military strategies concerned with the cultural differences of others, the U.S. military crafted a warfighting strategy in 2006 based on a counterinsurgency (COIN) doctrine of using cultural knowledge to battle the enemy. Charting how and why culture was embraced as a 21st-century “weapons system” shows us how technopolitical systems inside the military-industrial complex are envisioned, built, and then dismantled. Close tracking of these changing 21st-century strategies of war reveals, deep within the counterterrorism discourse, a fundamental belief in American exceptionalism. The principle that emerged from this ideological environment is that the enemies to be fought are not only terrorists or the ideologues of al-Qaʿida but also the countries and cultures that produced them. The implementation of this principle, despite its obvious failures, reveals the ideological underpinning that has justified the incredible destruction and securitized implementation of warfighting.</description><subject>21st century</subject><subject>Afghanistan</subject><subject>Afghanistan War</subject><subject>Armed Forces</subject><subject>Central Asian culture</subject><subject>Counterinsurgency</subject><subject>Counterterrorism</subject><subject>Crosscultural Differences</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Exceptionalism</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Invasion</subject><subject>Iraq</subject><subject>Iraq War-2003</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Military culture</subject><subject>Military history</subject><subject>Military strategy</subject><subject>Military training</subject><subject>Military-Industrial Complex</subject><subject>Officer training</subject><subject>Petraeus, David H</subject><subject>Roundtable</subject><subject>Simulation training</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><subject>Terrorists</subject><subject>The Technopolitics of War in the 20th and 21st Centuries</subject><subject>Twenty First Century</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>War</subject><subject>Weapons</subject><issn>0020-7438</issn><issn>1471-6380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUlLBDEQhYMoOC4_wIPQ4MVLa1X2eJPBDQQPjucm3UlrD72MSTfovzfDiIgiWJeieN97RVKEHCGcIaA6fwSgoDjTyAEw1RaZIVeYS6Zhm8zWcr7Wd8lejEsAMILqGTGLF59RjGM-9_04hfdsMYU-G4dsPrVp9hfZZedDU9k-u3qr_Gpsht62TewOyE5t2-gPP_s-ebq-Wsxv8_uHm7v55X1ecanH3KpKQI21BOopKod1KRnnzgtmhSi9Ns5oJxy3ziM45alMJQSlrsSScbZPTje5qzC8Tj6ORdfEyret7f0wxQKlEUZrg_ofqFRGMKXgfygzFDChJz_Q5ZD-KL05UWCo1JKbROGGqsIQY_B1sQpNZ8N7gVCsT1T8OlHyHG88yzgO4cvAGQNG2Vpnn5m2K0Pjnv231X-mfgAxw5iL</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Davis, Rochelle</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>The 21st-Century Turn to Culture: American Exceptionalism</title><author>Davis, Rochelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-a7c50f1f602e217d1fb6344de53a55be89d98d5d4ade10d7e266665522db1b343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>21st century</topic><topic>Afghanistan</topic><topic>Afghanistan War</topic><topic>Armed Forces</topic><topic>Central Asian culture</topic><topic>Counterinsurgency</topic><topic>Counterterrorism</topic><topic>Crosscultural Differences</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Exceptionalism</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Invasion</topic><topic>Iraq</topic><topic>Iraq War-2003</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Military culture</topic><topic>Military history</topic><topic>Military strategy</topic><topic>Military training</topic><topic>Military-Industrial Complex</topic><topic>Officer training</topic><topic>Petraeus, David H</topic><topic>Roundtable</topic><topic>Simulation training</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><topic>Terrorists</topic><topic>The Technopolitics of War in the 20th and 21st Centuries</topic><topic>Twenty First Century</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>War</topic><topic>Weapons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Rochelle</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International journal of Middle East studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Rochelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The 21st-Century Turn to Culture: American Exceptionalism</atitle><jtitle>International journal of Middle East studies</jtitle><addtitle>Int. J. Middle East Stud</addtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>794</spage><epage>796</epage><pages>794-796</pages><issn>0020-7438</issn><eissn>1471-6380</eissn><coden>IJMECN</coden><abstract>The U.S. Military's turn to culture in the 21st century occurred largely because of its inability to achieve its stated objectives in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan through conventional military force. Building on a long history of military strategies concerned with the cultural differences of others, the U.S. military crafted a warfighting strategy in 2006 based on a counterinsurgency (COIN) doctrine of using cultural knowledge to battle the enemy. Charting how and why culture was embraced as a 21st-century “weapons system” shows us how technopolitical systems inside the military-industrial complex are envisioned, built, and then dismantled. Close tracking of these changing 21st-century strategies of war reveals, deep within the counterterrorism discourse, a fundamental belief in American exceptionalism. The principle that emerged from this ideological environment is that the enemies to be fought are not only terrorists or the ideologues of al-Qaʿida but also the countries and cultures that produced them. The implementation of this principle, despite its obvious failures, reveals the ideological underpinning that has justified the incredible destruction and securitized implementation of warfighting.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0020743814001111</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-7438 |
ispartof | International journal of Middle East studies, 2014-11, Vol.46 (4), p.794-796 |
issn | 0020-7438 1471-6380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1695988918 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | 21st century Afghanistan Afghanistan War Armed Forces Central Asian culture Counterinsurgency Counterterrorism Crosscultural Differences Cultural differences Discourse Exceptionalism Ideology Implementation Invasion Iraq Iraq War-2003 Knowledge Law Military culture Military history Military strategy Military training Military-Industrial Complex Officer training Petraeus, David H Roundtable Simulation training Terrorism Terrorists The Technopolitics of War in the 20th and 21st Centuries Twenty First Century U.S.A War Weapons |
title | The 21st-Century Turn to Culture: American Exceptionalism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T04%3A52%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%2021st-Century%20Turn%20to%20Culture:%20American%20Exceptionalism&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20Middle%20East%20studies&rft.au=Davis,%20Rochelle&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=794&rft.epage=796&rft.pages=794-796&rft.issn=0020-7438&rft.eissn=1471-6380&rft.coden=IJMECN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0020743814001111&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43303231%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1609268649&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0020743814001111&rft_jstor_id=43303231&rfr_iscdi=true |