The 21st-Century Turn to Culture: American Exceptionalism

The U.S. Military's turn to culture in the 21st century occurred largely because of its inability to achieve its stated objectives in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan through conventional military force. Building on a long history of military strategies concerned with the cultural differences o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of Middle East studies 2014-11, Vol.46 (4), p.794-796
1. Verfasser: Davis, Rochelle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 796
container_issue 4
container_start_page 794
container_title International journal of Middle East studies
container_volume 46
creator Davis, Rochelle
description The U.S. Military's turn to culture in the 21st century occurred largely because of its inability to achieve its stated objectives in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan through conventional military force. Building on a long history of military strategies concerned with the cultural differences of others, the U.S. military crafted a warfighting strategy in 2006 based on a counterinsurgency (COIN) doctrine of using cultural knowledge to battle the enemy. Charting how and why culture was embraced as a 21st-century “weapons system” shows us how technopolitical systems inside the military-industrial complex are envisioned, built, and then dismantled. Close tracking of these changing 21st-century strategies of war reveals, deep within the counterterrorism discourse, a fundamental belief in American exceptionalism. The principle that emerged from this ideological environment is that the enemies to be fought are not only terrorists or the ideologues of al-Qaʿida but also the countries and cultures that produced them. The implementation of this principle, despite its obvious failures, reveals the ideological underpinning that has justified the incredible destruction and securitized implementation of warfighting.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0020743814001111
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1695988918</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0020743814001111</cupid><jstor_id>43303231</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43303231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-a7c50f1f602e217d1fb6344de53a55be89d98d5d4ade10d7e266665522db1b343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUlLBDEQhYMoOC4_wIPQ4MVLa1X2eJPBDQQPjucm3UlrD72MSTfovzfDiIgiWJeieN97RVKEHCGcIaA6fwSgoDjTyAEw1RaZIVeYS6Zhm8zWcr7Wd8lejEsAMILqGTGLF59RjGM-9_04hfdsMYU-G4dsPrVp9hfZZedDU9k-u3qr_Gpsht62TewOyE5t2-gPP_s-ebq-Wsxv8_uHm7v55X1ecanH3KpKQI21BOopKod1KRnnzgtmhSi9Ns5oJxy3ziM45alMJQSlrsSScbZPTje5qzC8Tj6ORdfEyret7f0wxQKlEUZrg_ofqFRGMKXgfygzFDChJz_Q5ZD-KL05UWCo1JKbROGGqsIQY_B1sQpNZ8N7gVCsT1T8OlHyHG88yzgO4cvAGQNG2Vpnn5m2K0Pjnv231X-mfgAxw5iL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1609268649</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The 21st-Century Turn to Culture: American Exceptionalism</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Davis, Rochelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Rochelle</creatorcontrib><description>The U.S. Military's turn to culture in the 21st century occurred largely because of its inability to achieve its stated objectives in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan through conventional military force. Building on a long history of military strategies concerned with the cultural differences of others, the U.S. military crafted a warfighting strategy in 2006 based on a counterinsurgency (COIN) doctrine of using cultural knowledge to battle the enemy. Charting how and why culture was embraced as a 21st-century “weapons system” shows us how technopolitical systems inside the military-industrial complex are envisioned, built, and then dismantled. Close tracking of these changing 21st-century strategies of war reveals, deep within the counterterrorism discourse, a fundamental belief in American exceptionalism. The principle that emerged from this ideological environment is that the enemies to be fought are not only terrorists or the ideologues of al-Qaʿida but also the countries and cultures that produced them. The implementation of this principle, despite its obvious failures, reveals the ideological underpinning that has justified the incredible destruction and securitized implementation of warfighting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7438</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0020743814001111</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJMECN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>21st century ; Afghanistan ; Afghanistan War ; Armed Forces ; Central Asian culture ; Counterinsurgency ; Counterterrorism ; Crosscultural Differences ; Cultural differences ; Discourse ; Exceptionalism ; Ideology ; Implementation ; Invasion ; Iraq ; Iraq War-2003 ; Knowledge ; Law ; Military culture ; Military history ; Military strategy ; Military training ; Military-Industrial Complex ; Officer training ; Petraeus, David H ; Roundtable ; Simulation training ; Terrorism ; Terrorists ; The Technopolitics of War in the 20th and 21st Centuries ; Twenty First Century ; U.S.A ; War ; Weapons</subject><ispartof>International journal of Middle East studies, 2014-11, Vol.46 (4), p.794-796</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-a7c50f1f602e217d1fb6344de53a55be89d98d5d4ade10d7e266665522db1b343</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43303231$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020743814001111/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,12845,27924,27925,33775,55628,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Rochelle</creatorcontrib><title>The 21st-Century Turn to Culture: American Exceptionalism</title><title>International journal of Middle East studies</title><addtitle>Int. J. Middle East Stud</addtitle><description>The U.S. Military's turn to culture in the 21st century occurred largely because of its inability to achieve its stated objectives in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan through conventional military force. Building on a long history of military strategies concerned with the cultural differences of others, the U.S. military crafted a warfighting strategy in 2006 based on a counterinsurgency (COIN) doctrine of using cultural knowledge to battle the enemy. Charting how and why culture was embraced as a 21st-century “weapons system” shows us how technopolitical systems inside the military-industrial complex are envisioned, built, and then dismantled. Close tracking of these changing 21st-century strategies of war reveals, deep within the counterterrorism discourse, a fundamental belief in American exceptionalism. The principle that emerged from this ideological environment is that the enemies to be fought are not only terrorists or the ideologues of al-Qaʿida but also the countries and cultures that produced them. The implementation of this principle, despite its obvious failures, reveals the ideological underpinning that has justified the incredible destruction and securitized implementation of warfighting.</description><subject>21st century</subject><subject>Afghanistan</subject><subject>Afghanistan War</subject><subject>Armed Forces</subject><subject>Central Asian culture</subject><subject>Counterinsurgency</subject><subject>Counterterrorism</subject><subject>Crosscultural Differences</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Exceptionalism</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Invasion</subject><subject>Iraq</subject><subject>Iraq War-2003</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Military culture</subject><subject>Military history</subject><subject>Military strategy</subject><subject>Military training</subject><subject>Military-Industrial Complex</subject><subject>Officer training</subject><subject>Petraeus, David H</subject><subject>Roundtable</subject><subject>Simulation training</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><subject>Terrorists</subject><subject>The Technopolitics of War in the 20th and 21st Centuries</subject><subject>Twenty First Century</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>War</subject><subject>Weapons</subject><issn>0020-7438</issn><issn>1471-6380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUlLBDEQhYMoOC4_wIPQ4MVLa1X2eJPBDQQPjucm3UlrD72MSTfovzfDiIgiWJeieN97RVKEHCGcIaA6fwSgoDjTyAEw1RaZIVeYS6Zhm8zWcr7Wd8lejEsAMILqGTGLF59RjGM-9_04hfdsMYU-G4dsPrVp9hfZZedDU9k-u3qr_Gpsht62TewOyE5t2-gPP_s-ebq-Wsxv8_uHm7v55X1ecanH3KpKQI21BOopKod1KRnnzgtmhSi9Ns5oJxy3ziM45alMJQSlrsSScbZPTje5qzC8Tj6ORdfEyret7f0wxQKlEUZrg_ofqFRGMKXgfygzFDChJz_Q5ZD-KL05UWCo1JKbROGGqsIQY_B1sQpNZ8N7gVCsT1T8OlHyHG88yzgO4cvAGQNG2Vpnn5m2K0Pjnv231X-mfgAxw5iL</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Davis, Rochelle</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>The 21st-Century Turn to Culture: American Exceptionalism</title><author>Davis, Rochelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-a7c50f1f602e217d1fb6344de53a55be89d98d5d4ade10d7e266665522db1b343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>21st century</topic><topic>Afghanistan</topic><topic>Afghanistan War</topic><topic>Armed Forces</topic><topic>Central Asian culture</topic><topic>Counterinsurgency</topic><topic>Counterterrorism</topic><topic>Crosscultural Differences</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Exceptionalism</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Invasion</topic><topic>Iraq</topic><topic>Iraq War-2003</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Military culture</topic><topic>Military history</topic><topic>Military strategy</topic><topic>Military training</topic><topic>Military-Industrial Complex</topic><topic>Officer training</topic><topic>Petraeus, David H</topic><topic>Roundtable</topic><topic>Simulation training</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><topic>Terrorists</topic><topic>The Technopolitics of War in the 20th and 21st Centuries</topic><topic>Twenty First Century</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>War</topic><topic>Weapons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Rochelle</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International journal of Middle East studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Rochelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The 21st-Century Turn to Culture: American Exceptionalism</atitle><jtitle>International journal of Middle East studies</jtitle><addtitle>Int. J. Middle East Stud</addtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>794</spage><epage>796</epage><pages>794-796</pages><issn>0020-7438</issn><eissn>1471-6380</eissn><coden>IJMECN</coden><abstract>The U.S. Military's turn to culture in the 21st century occurred largely because of its inability to achieve its stated objectives in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan through conventional military force. Building on a long history of military strategies concerned with the cultural differences of others, the U.S. military crafted a warfighting strategy in 2006 based on a counterinsurgency (COIN) doctrine of using cultural knowledge to battle the enemy. Charting how and why culture was embraced as a 21st-century “weapons system” shows us how technopolitical systems inside the military-industrial complex are envisioned, built, and then dismantled. Close tracking of these changing 21st-century strategies of war reveals, deep within the counterterrorism discourse, a fundamental belief in American exceptionalism. The principle that emerged from this ideological environment is that the enemies to be fought are not only terrorists or the ideologues of al-Qaʿida but also the countries and cultures that produced them. The implementation of this principle, despite its obvious failures, reveals the ideological underpinning that has justified the incredible destruction and securitized implementation of warfighting.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0020743814001111</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7438
ispartof International journal of Middle East studies, 2014-11, Vol.46 (4), p.794-796
issn 0020-7438
1471-6380
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1695988918
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects 21st century
Afghanistan
Afghanistan War
Armed Forces
Central Asian culture
Counterinsurgency
Counterterrorism
Crosscultural Differences
Cultural differences
Discourse
Exceptionalism
Ideology
Implementation
Invasion
Iraq
Iraq War-2003
Knowledge
Law
Military culture
Military history
Military strategy
Military training
Military-Industrial Complex
Officer training
Petraeus, David H
Roundtable
Simulation training
Terrorism
Terrorists
The Technopolitics of War in the 20th and 21st Centuries
Twenty First Century
U.S.A
War
Weapons
title The 21st-Century Turn to Culture: American Exceptionalism
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T04%3A52%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%2021st-Century%20Turn%20to%20Culture:%20American%20Exceptionalism&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20Middle%20East%20studies&rft.au=Davis,%20Rochelle&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=794&rft.epage=796&rft.pages=794-796&rft.issn=0020-7438&rft.eissn=1471-6380&rft.coden=IJMECN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0020743814001111&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43303231%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1609268649&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0020743814001111&rft_jstor_id=43303231&rfr_iscdi=true