Liberal or Restrictive Transfusion after Cardiac Surgery

To the Editor: In their article on red-cell transfusion, Murphy et al. (March 12 issue) 1 report substantial nonadherence to treatment in both study groups — one of which had a restrictive threshold for hemoglobin level in red-cell transfusions and one of which had a liberal threshold. Although nona...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 2015-07, Vol.373 (2), p.190-193
Hauptverfasser: Mutneja, Hemant R, Arora, Shilpa, Vij, Aviral, Marik, Paul E, Flemmer, Mark, Shander, Aryeh, Fischer, Marc-Olivier, Lorne, Emmanuel, Vallet, Benoît, Kramer, Robert S, Groom, Robert C, Hayes, Timothy E, Casaer, Michael P, Van den Berghe, Greet, Plumb, James O.M, Grocott, Michael P.W, Reeves, Barnaby C, Rogers, Chris A, Murphy, Gavin J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To the Editor: In their article on red-cell transfusion, Murphy et al. (March 12 issue) 1 report substantial nonadherence to treatment in both study groups — one of which had a restrictive threshold for hemoglobin level in red-cell transfusions and one of which had a liberal threshold. Although nonadherence (defined as either the failure to transfuse red cells within 24 hours after a patient's hemoglobin fell below an assigned threshold or the administration of a transfusion when the hemoglobin level was above the assigned threshold) increases the likelihood of a null result for the primary outcome, it might confound the finding . . .
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMc1505810