Liberal or Restrictive Transfusion after Cardiac Surgery
To the Editor: In their article on red-cell transfusion, Murphy et al. (March 12 issue) 1 report substantial nonadherence to treatment in both study groups — one of which had a restrictive threshold for hemoglobin level in red-cell transfusions and one of which had a liberal threshold. Although nona...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2015-07, Vol.373 (2), p.190-193 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To the Editor:
In their article on red-cell transfusion, Murphy et al. (March 12 issue)
1
report substantial nonadherence to treatment in both study groups — one of which had a restrictive threshold for hemoglobin level in red-cell transfusions and one of which had a liberal threshold. Although nonadherence (defined as either the failure to transfuse red cells within 24 hours after a patient's hemoglobin fell below an assigned threshold or the administration of a transfusion when the hemoglobin level was above the assigned threshold) increases the likelihood of a null result for the primary outcome, it might confound the finding . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMc1505810 |