Iridium-Catalyzed Borylation of Primary Benzylic C–H Bonds without a Directing Group: Scope, Mechanism, and Origins of Selectivity

Primary benzylic boronate esters are useful intermediates in organic synthesis, but these reagents cannot be prepared by hydroboration. The benzylic C–H boryl­ation of methyl­arenes would be a method to form these products, but such reactions without neat methyl­arene or a directing group are unknow...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Chemical Society 2015-07, Vol.137 (26), p.8633-8643
Hauptverfasser: Larsen, Matthew A, Wilson, Conner V, Hartwig, John F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Primary benzylic boronate esters are useful intermediates in organic synthesis, but these reagents cannot be prepared by hydroboration. The benzylic C–H boryl­ation of methyl­arenes would be a method to form these products, but such reactions without neat methyl­arene or a directing group are unknown. We report an approach to divert the boryl­ation of methyl­arenes from aromatic positions to benzylic positions with a silylborane as reagent and a new iridium catalyst containing an electron-deficient phenanthroline as ligand. This system forms benzylic boronate esters selectively over the corresponding aryl boronate esters. An Ir diboryl monosilyl complex ligated by the phenanthroline was isolated and determined to be the resting state of the catalyst. Mechanistic studies show that this complex is kinetically competent to be an intermediate in the catalytic process. Kinetic studies of benzylic and aryl C–H boryl­ation catalyzed by various Ir complexes show that the rate of aryl C–H boryl­ation decreases with decreasing electron density at the metal center of the Ir catalyst, but that the rate of benzylic C–H boryl­ation is less sensitive to the degree of electron density at the metal center of the Ir catalyst. Kinetic and computational studies suggest that the two boryl­ation reactions respond differently to the degree of electron density at the metal center because they occur with different turnover-limiting steps. The turnover-limiting step in the boryl­ation of aryl C–H bonds is known to be C–H oxidative addition, but the turnover-limiting step of the boryl­ation of benzylic C–H bonds appears to be an isomerization prior to C–B reductive elimination.
ISSN:0002-7863
1520-5126
DOI:10.1021/jacs.5b04899