Ex vivo comparison of radiographic and electronic root canal length measurements in primary molars

The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of root canal length measurements of primary teeth using an electronic apex locator (EAL) and digital radiography in comparison to stereomicroscopic measurement as gold standard. After preparation of access cavities of twenty extracted primary molars...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of paediatric dentistry 2015-06, Vol.16 (2), p.149-153
Hauptverfasser: Topaloglu-Ak, A, Aykut Yetkiner, A, Güniz Baksi, B, Eronat, C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of root canal length measurements of primary teeth using an electronic apex locator (EAL) and digital radiography in comparison to stereomicroscopic measurement as gold standard. After preparation of access cavities of twenty extracted primary molars, the teeth were embedded in alginate blocks. Endodontic files were inserted in the root canals and the length was measured using ProPex II (Dentsply, Maillefer). When the reading was stable for 5s a silicone stop was used for reference. The true lengths of the files were then measured using a micrometer. The gold standard was determined by observing the tip of the file at the apical foramen under a stereomicroscope. For radiographic measurements standard images were obtained at 30 cm source-to-object distance, and zero degrees vertical and horizontal angulations. Radiographic images of each experimental tooth were obtained with the Digora Storage Phosphor Plates (SPP) (Soredex, Orion Corporation, Helsinki, Finland) with the x-ray unit operating at 65 kVp and 10 mA for 0.16 seconds (Trophy Radiologie, Vincennes, France). The radiographic root lengths were measured with the measurement tool of the Digora for Windows software. The mean measurements of both methods were compared to the gold standard measurements using Repeated Measure ANOVA test with Bonferroni adjustments to identify the pair-wise differences (p=0.05). The mean measurements obtained with the EAL (14.06±1.89 mm) were significantly lower than measurements done with SPP images (14.24±1.98 mm) (p
ISSN:1591-996X