Dynamic Effect of Quadriceps Muscle Activation on Anterior Tibial Translation After Single-Bundle and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Purpose To examine differences in anterior tibial translation in 3 groups: single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)–reconstructed, double-bundle ACL-reconstructed, and ACL-intact knees under gradual dynamic quadriceps muscle activation. Methods Thirty male patients underwent successful single-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthroscopy 2015-07, Vol.31 (7), p.1303-1309
Hauptverfasser: Tsarouhas, Alexander, M.D, Giakas, Giannis, Ph.D, Malizos, Konstantinos N., M.D, Spiropoulos, Giannis, M.Sc, Sideris, Vasilios, M.Sc, Koutedakis, Yiannis, Ph.D, Hantes, Michael E., M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To examine differences in anterior tibial translation in 3 groups: single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)–reconstructed, double-bundle ACL-reconstructed, and ACL-intact knees under gradual dynamic quadriceps muscle activation. Methods Thirty male patients underwent successful single-bundle (n = 15) and double-bundle (n = 15) ACL reconstructions; 15 healthy controls were included in the study. Anterior tibial translation was assessed at 30° of knee flexion in the resting position (0% quadriceps activation) and under 50% and 100% of maximum quadriceps concentric contraction using an isokinetic dynamometer with the KT-2000 arthrometer securely attached to the participants' knees. Results The 2 ACL-reconstructed groups were similar regarding International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS), Tegner, and Lysholm scores and preliminary isokinetic evaluation (P  = .38). Quadriceps activation significantly affected anterior tibial translation (P  = .001, α = 0.98). In all 3 study groups, anterior tibial translation was significantly higher under 100% quadriceps activation compared with 0% contraction (P  = .01) and 50% quadriceps activation (P  = .047). There were no between-group differences in anterior tibial translation with 0%, 50%, or 100% quadriceps activation (P  = .46). Conclusions Under quadriceps muscle activation, anteroposterior knee laxity in ACL-intact and ACL-reconstructed knees is gradually increased. Single-bundle and double-bundle ACL-reconstructed knees show a similar increase in anterior tibial translation under gradual quadriceps contraction. When comparing different ACL reconstruction techniques in the experimental setting, dynamic, in addition to static, testing is advised to reach a comprehensive assessment of anteroposterior knee stability. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative study.
ISSN:0749-8063
1526-3231
DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2015.02.028