Coordinated care versus standard care in hospital admissions of people with chronic illness: a randomised controlled trial

Objective: To determine whether Care Navigation (CN), a nurse‐led hospital‐based coordinated care intervention, reduced the use of hospital services and improved quality of life for patients with chronic illness. Design: Randomised controlled trial; participants were allocated to CN or standard care...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical journal of Australia 2015-07, Vol.203 (1), p.33-38
Hauptverfasser: Plant, Natalie A, Kelly, Patrick J, Leeder, Stephen R, D'Souza, Mario, Mallitt, Kylie‐Ann, Usherwood, Tim, Jan, Stephen, Boyages, Steven C, Essue, Beverley M, McNab, Justin, Gillespie, James A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To determine whether Care Navigation (CN), a nurse‐led hospital‐based coordinated care intervention, reduced the use of hospital services and improved quality of life for patients with chronic illness. Design: Randomised controlled trial; participants were allocated to CN or standard care. Participants and setting: Patients with chronic illness presenting to the emergency department of Nepean Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales. High‐risk status for an unplanned admission was defined as i) three or more unplanned hospital admissions in 12 months for patients aged ≥ 70 or at least one admission for cardiac or respiratory disease in patients aged 16–69 years; or ii) judged by a CN nurse to be high risk and likely to benefit. Main outcome measures: Numbers of re‐presentations or readmissions, quality of life, time to re‐presentation, readmission or death, length of stay, and access to hospital and community health services. Results: 500 participants were randomised between May 2010 and February 2011; 359 by previous unplanned admission and 141 by clinical impression. The CN group received more community health services (rate ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.35–2.81; P 
ISSN:0025-729X
1326-5377
DOI:10.5694/mja14.01049