Contribution of Computed Tomography Enema and Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose Multifocal and Multicentric Bowel Lesions in Patients With Colorectal Endometriosis

Abstract Study Objective To evaluate the diagnostic contribution of the computed tomography (CT) enema and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for multifocal (multiple lesions affecting the same segment) and multicentric (multiple lesions affecting several digestive segments) bowel endometriosis. Desig...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of minimally invasive gynecology 2015-07, Vol.22 (5), p.776-784
Hauptverfasser: Belghiti, Jeremie, MD, Thomassin-Naggara, Isabelle, MD, PhD, Zacharopoulou, Chrysoula, MD, PhD, Zilberman, Sonia, MD, Jarboui, Lamia, MD, Bazot, Marc, MD, PhD, Ballester, Marcos, MD, PhD, Daraï, Emile, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Study Objective To evaluate the diagnostic contribution of the computed tomography (CT) enema and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for multifocal (multiple lesions affecting the same segment) and multicentric (multiple lesions affecting several digestive segments) bowel endometriosis. Design Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Patients Eighty-five patients. Setting Tenon University Hospital, Paris, France. Intervention All patients received a preoperative CT enema and underwent MRI interpreted by 2 radiologists. Measurements and Main Results Patients underwent colorectal resection for colorectal endometriosis from February 2009 to November 2012. Nineteen patients (22%) had multifocal lesions, and 11 patients (13%) had multicentric lesions. Six patients (7%) had both multifocal and multicentric lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) of MRI for the diagnosis of multifocal lesions were 0.58, 0.84, 3.55, and 0.5, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative LRs of the CT enema for the diagnosis of multifocal lesions were 0.64, 0.86, 4.56, and 0.4, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive LR of MRI for the diagnosis of multicentric lesions were 1, 0.88, and 8.4, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative LRs of MRI for the diagnosis of multicentric lesions were 0.46, 0.92, 5.6, and 0.59, respectively. No difference was observed between MRI and the CT enema for the diagnosis of multifocal and multicentric colorectal endometriosis. The interobserver agreement was good for MRI and the CT enema (κ = 0.45 and 0.45) for multifocality, and it was poor for both MRI and the CT enema (κ = 0.32 and 0.34) for multicentricity. Conclusions Both MRI and the CT enema were able to diagnose multifocal and multicentric bowel endometriosis with similar accuracy.
ISSN:1553-4650
1553-4669
DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2015.02.019