Performance of an IGCC Plant with Carbon Capture and Coal-CO sub(2)-Slurry Feed: Impact of Coal Rank, Slurry Loading, and Syngas Cooling Technology
The high heat capacity and latent enthalpy of vaporization of water lead to a low gasification efficiency in gasifiers fed with coal-water slurry. Liquid carbon dioxide, CO sub(2(l)), has been suggested as an alternative slurrying medium to improve the efficiency of low-rank coal gasification in int...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Industrial & engineering chemistry research 2012-09, Vol.51 (36), p.11778-11790-11778-11790 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 11790-11778-11790 |
---|---|
container_issue | 36 |
container_start_page | 11778 |
container_title | Industrial & engineering chemistry research |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Botero, Cristina Field, Randall P Brasington, Robert D Herzog, Howard J Ghoniem, Ahmed F |
description | The high heat capacity and latent enthalpy of vaporization of water lead to a low gasification efficiency in gasifiers fed with coal-water slurry. Liquid carbon dioxide, CO sub(2(l)), has been suggested as an alternative slurrying medium to improve the efficiency of low-rank coal gasification in integrated gasification combined cycle power plants with carbon capture. Steady-state process simulation is used in this work to confirm published findings and present a comprehensive assessment of the impact of the coal rank, gasifier cooling technology, and CO sub(2) slurry loading uncertainty on the performance advantage of CO sub(2) slurry-fed plants. A power generation efficiency improvement of up to 25% (5%-points) is predicted, which is shown to increase with decreasing coal rank and to be highest for full-quench gasifier cooling technology; the latter is a significant source of capital cost savings and is especially attractive when combined with CO sub(2) slurry feed. Using CO sub(2(l)) instead of water slurry reduces the performance penalty of low-rank coal gasification by half, thus substantially improving the feedstock flexibility of the plant. With a single exception, the performance benefit of coal-CO sub(2) slurry was found to be outside the uncertainty range of the slurry loading, which is still one of the key unknowns of this alternative feed system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/ie3018093 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692393665</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1687690585</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p665-d77c4c848ad9bc3050ee3f36bf9f53cd72a83261055ade88db4482dd578ca873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNj9FKwzAYhYMoOKcXvkEuJ6yaNE371zsp2xwMNtzuR5qkW7VLatIiew5f2Ez3AF4dOHx8h4PQPSWPlMT0qdaMUCA5u0ADymMScZLwSzQgABBxAH6Nbrx_J4RwniQD9L3SrrLuIIzU2FZYGDyfFQVeNcJ0-Kvu9rgQrrQmRNv1TgdC4cKKJiqW2PflKH6I1k3v3BFPtVbPeH5ohexOrhOF34T5GOMzsbBC1WY3_pWsj2YnfKBsEzq80XJvbGN3x1t0VYnG67tzDtF6OtkUr9FiOZsXL4uoTVMeqSyTiYQEhMpLyQgnWrOKpWWVV5xJlcUCWJzScFQoDaDKJIFYKZ6BFJCxIRr9WVtnP3vtu-2h9lI34bi2vd_SNI9ZzsLUP1DI0pxw4OwHl5h0nA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1687690585</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of an IGCC Plant with Carbon Capture and Coal-CO sub(2)-Slurry Feed: Impact of Coal Rank, Slurry Loading, and Syngas Cooling Technology</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Botero, Cristina ; Field, Randall P ; Brasington, Robert D ; Herzog, Howard J ; Ghoniem, Ahmed F</creator><creatorcontrib>Botero, Cristina ; Field, Randall P ; Brasington, Robert D ; Herzog, Howard J ; Ghoniem, Ahmed F</creatorcontrib><description>The high heat capacity and latent enthalpy of vaporization of water lead to a low gasification efficiency in gasifiers fed with coal-water slurry. Liquid carbon dioxide, CO sub(2(l)), has been suggested as an alternative slurrying medium to improve the efficiency of low-rank coal gasification in integrated gasification combined cycle power plants with carbon capture. Steady-state process simulation is used in this work to confirm published findings and present a comprehensive assessment of the impact of the coal rank, gasifier cooling technology, and CO sub(2) slurry loading uncertainty on the performance advantage of CO sub(2) slurry-fed plants. A power generation efficiency improvement of up to 25% (5%-points) is predicted, which is shown to increase with decreasing coal rank and to be highest for full-quench gasifier cooling technology; the latter is a significant source of capital cost savings and is especially attractive when combined with CO sub(2) slurry feed. Using CO sub(2(l)) instead of water slurry reduces the performance penalty of low-rank coal gasification by half, thus substantially improving the feedstock flexibility of the plant. With a single exception, the performance benefit of coal-CO sub(2) slurry was found to be outside the uncertainty range of the slurry loading, which is still one of the key unknowns of this alternative feed system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-5885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5045</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ie3018093</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Carbon capture and storage ; Carbon dioxide ; Coal ; Cooling ; Gasification ; Power plants ; Slurries ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2012-09, Vol.51 (36), p.11778-11790-11778-11790</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Botero, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Field, Randall P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brasington, Robert D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herzog, Howard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghoniem, Ahmed F</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of an IGCC Plant with Carbon Capture and Coal-CO sub(2)-Slurry Feed: Impact of Coal Rank, Slurry Loading, and Syngas Cooling Technology</title><title>Industrial & engineering chemistry research</title><description>The high heat capacity and latent enthalpy of vaporization of water lead to a low gasification efficiency in gasifiers fed with coal-water slurry. Liquid carbon dioxide, CO sub(2(l)), has been suggested as an alternative slurrying medium to improve the efficiency of low-rank coal gasification in integrated gasification combined cycle power plants with carbon capture. Steady-state process simulation is used in this work to confirm published findings and present a comprehensive assessment of the impact of the coal rank, gasifier cooling technology, and CO sub(2) slurry loading uncertainty on the performance advantage of CO sub(2) slurry-fed plants. A power generation efficiency improvement of up to 25% (5%-points) is predicted, which is shown to increase with decreasing coal rank and to be highest for full-quench gasifier cooling technology; the latter is a significant source of capital cost savings and is especially attractive when combined with CO sub(2) slurry feed. Using CO sub(2(l)) instead of water slurry reduces the performance penalty of low-rank coal gasification by half, thus substantially improving the feedstock flexibility of the plant. With a single exception, the performance benefit of coal-CO sub(2) slurry was found to be outside the uncertainty range of the slurry loading, which is still one of the key unknowns of this alternative feed system.</description><subject>Carbon capture and storage</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Gasification</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Slurries</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0888-5885</issn><issn>1520-5045</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNj9FKwzAYhYMoOKcXvkEuJ6yaNE371zsp2xwMNtzuR5qkW7VLatIiew5f2Ez3AF4dOHx8h4PQPSWPlMT0qdaMUCA5u0ADymMScZLwSzQgABBxAH6Nbrx_J4RwniQD9L3SrrLuIIzU2FZYGDyfFQVeNcJ0-Kvu9rgQrrQmRNv1TgdC4cKKJiqW2PflKH6I1k3v3BFPtVbPeH5ohexOrhOF34T5GOMzsbBC1WY3_pWsj2YnfKBsEzq80XJvbGN3x1t0VYnG67tzDtF6OtkUr9FiOZsXL4uoTVMeqSyTiYQEhMpLyQgnWrOKpWWVV5xJlcUCWJzScFQoDaDKJIFYKZ6BFJCxIRr9WVtnP3vtu-2h9lI34bi2vd_SNI9ZzsLUP1DI0pxw4OwHl5h0nA</recordid><startdate>20120912</startdate><enddate>20120912</enddate><creator>Botero, Cristina</creator><creator>Field, Randall P</creator><creator>Brasington, Robert D</creator><creator>Herzog, Howard J</creator><creator>Ghoniem, Ahmed F</creator><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120912</creationdate><title>Performance of an IGCC Plant with Carbon Capture and Coal-CO sub(2)-Slurry Feed: Impact of Coal Rank, Slurry Loading, and Syngas Cooling Technology</title><author>Botero, Cristina ; Field, Randall P ; Brasington, Robert D ; Herzog, Howard J ; Ghoniem, Ahmed F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p665-d77c4c848ad9bc3050ee3f36bf9f53cd72a83261055ade88db4482dd578ca873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Carbon capture and storage</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Gasification</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Slurries</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Botero, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Field, Randall P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brasington, Robert D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herzog, Howard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghoniem, Ahmed F</creatorcontrib><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Industrial & engineering chemistry research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Botero, Cristina</au><au>Field, Randall P</au><au>Brasington, Robert D</au><au>Herzog, Howard J</au><au>Ghoniem, Ahmed F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of an IGCC Plant with Carbon Capture and Coal-CO sub(2)-Slurry Feed: Impact of Coal Rank, Slurry Loading, and Syngas Cooling Technology</atitle><jtitle>Industrial & engineering chemistry research</jtitle><date>2012-09-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>36</issue><spage>11778</spage><epage>11790-11778-11790</epage><pages>11778-11790-11778-11790</pages><issn>0888-5885</issn><eissn>1520-5045</eissn><abstract>The high heat capacity and latent enthalpy of vaporization of water lead to a low gasification efficiency in gasifiers fed with coal-water slurry. Liquid carbon dioxide, CO sub(2(l)), has been suggested as an alternative slurrying medium to improve the efficiency of low-rank coal gasification in integrated gasification combined cycle power plants with carbon capture. Steady-state process simulation is used in this work to confirm published findings and present a comprehensive assessment of the impact of the coal rank, gasifier cooling technology, and CO sub(2) slurry loading uncertainty on the performance advantage of CO sub(2) slurry-fed plants. A power generation efficiency improvement of up to 25% (5%-points) is predicted, which is shown to increase with decreasing coal rank and to be highest for full-quench gasifier cooling technology; the latter is a significant source of capital cost savings and is especially attractive when combined with CO sub(2) slurry feed. Using CO sub(2(l)) instead of water slurry reduces the performance penalty of low-rank coal gasification by half, thus substantially improving the feedstock flexibility of the plant. With a single exception, the performance benefit of coal-CO sub(2) slurry was found to be outside the uncertainty range of the slurry loading, which is still one of the key unknowns of this alternative feed system.</abstract><doi>10.1021/ie3018093</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-5885 |
ispartof | Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2012-09, Vol.51 (36), p.11778-11790-11778-11790 |
issn | 0888-5885 1520-5045 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692393665 |
source | ACS Publications |
subjects | Carbon capture and storage Carbon dioxide Coal Cooling Gasification Power plants Slurries Uncertainty |
title | Performance of an IGCC Plant with Carbon Capture and Coal-CO sub(2)-Slurry Feed: Impact of Coal Rank, Slurry Loading, and Syngas Cooling Technology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T22%3A13%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20an%20IGCC%20Plant%20with%20Carbon%20Capture%20and%20Coal-CO%20sub(2)-Slurry%20Feed:%20Impact%20of%20Coal%20Rank,%20Slurry%20Loading,%20and%20Syngas%20Cooling%20Technology&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20&%20engineering%20chemistry%20research&rft.au=Botero,%20Cristina&rft.date=2012-09-12&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=36&rft.spage=11778&rft.epage=11790-11778-11790&rft.pages=11778-11790-11778-11790&rft.issn=0888-5885&rft.eissn=1520-5045&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ie3018093&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1687690585%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1687690585&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |