Performance of an IGCC Plant with Carbon Capture and Coal-CO sub(2)-Slurry Feed: Impact of Coal Rank, Slurry Loading, and Syngas Cooling Technology
The high heat capacity and latent enthalpy of vaporization of water lead to a low gasification efficiency in gasifiers fed with coal-water slurry. Liquid carbon dioxide, CO sub(2(l)), has been suggested as an alternative slurrying medium to improve the efficiency of low-rank coal gasification in int...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Industrial & engineering chemistry research 2012-09, Vol.51 (36), p.11778-11790-11778-11790 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The high heat capacity and latent enthalpy of vaporization of water lead to a low gasification efficiency in gasifiers fed with coal-water slurry. Liquid carbon dioxide, CO sub(2(l)), has been suggested as an alternative slurrying medium to improve the efficiency of low-rank coal gasification in integrated gasification combined cycle power plants with carbon capture. Steady-state process simulation is used in this work to confirm published findings and present a comprehensive assessment of the impact of the coal rank, gasifier cooling technology, and CO sub(2) slurry loading uncertainty on the performance advantage of CO sub(2) slurry-fed plants. A power generation efficiency improvement of up to 25% (5%-points) is predicted, which is shown to increase with decreasing coal rank and to be highest for full-quench gasifier cooling technology; the latter is a significant source of capital cost savings and is especially attractive when combined with CO sub(2) slurry feed. Using CO sub(2(l)) instead of water slurry reduces the performance penalty of low-rank coal gasification by half, thus substantially improving the feedstock flexibility of the plant. With a single exception, the performance benefit of coal-CO sub(2) slurry was found to be outside the uncertainty range of the slurry loading, which is still one of the key unknowns of this alternative feed system. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0888-5885 1520-5045 |
DOI: | 10.1021/ie3018093 |