Durable bonding to mechanically and/or chemically pre-treated dental zirconia

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the effect of mechanical and chemical surface pre-treatment on the bond durability of two composite cements to dental zirconia. Methods Fully sintered IPS e.max ZirCAD (Ivoclar-Vivadent) blocks were either subjected to tribochemical silica sandblasting (CoJet, 3M ESPE...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dentistry 2013-02, Vol.41 (2), p.170-179
Hauptverfasser: Inokoshi, Masanao, Kameyama, Atsushi, De Munck, Jan, Minakuchi, Shunsuke, Van Meerbeek, Bart
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objectives To evaluate the effect of mechanical and chemical surface pre-treatment on the bond durability of two composite cements to dental zirconia. Methods Fully sintered IPS e.max ZirCAD (Ivoclar-Vivadent) blocks were either subjected to tribochemical silica sandblasting (CoJet, 3M ESPE) or not mechanically pre-treated. Next, the zirconia samples were either additionally pre-treated using one of two silane/MDP-combined ceramic primers (Clearfil Ceramic Primer, Kuraray; Monobond Plus, Ivoclar-Vivadent), or not further chemically pre-treated. Finally, two identically pre-treated zirconia blocks were bonded together using either a conventional BisGMA-based (Clearfil Esthetic Cement, Kuraray) or an MDP-based (Panavia F2.0, Kuraray) ‘self-etch’ dual-cure composite cement. The specimens were trimmed at the interface to a cylindrical hour-glass shape and stored for 7 days in distilled water (37 °C), after which they were randomly exposed to one of three ageing protocols: (1) immersed in 37 °C water for 10 days (10 d); (2) subjected to 10,000 thermo-cycles (TC); or (3) immersed in 37 °C water for 6 months (6 m). After storage, the micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) was determined in MPa ( n = 15–21/group). Fractographic analysis was performed using SEM. Results Weibull analysis revealed the highest Weibull scale and shape parameters for the ‘CoJet/Clearfil Ceramic Primer/Panavia F2.0/10d’ combination. While the BisGMA-based composite cement Clearfil Esthetic Cement (Kuraray) bonded equally well to zirconia using either tribochemical silica sandblasting (CoJet, 3M ESPE) or not, sandblasting appeared indispensable for the MDP-based and more hydrophilic composite cement Panavia F2.0 (Kuraray). Conclusions Combined mechanical and chemical pre-treatment can best be recommended to durably bond to zirconia. Clinical significance As a standard procedure to durable bond zirconia to tooth tissue, both mechanical (tribochemical silica coating) and chemical (silane/MDP-combined ceramic primers) is clinically highly recommended.
ISSN:0300-5712
1879-176X
DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2012.10.017