Dehydration of ethanol over zeolites, silica alumina and alumina: Lewis acidity, Brønsted acidity and confinement effects

•H-MOR is the most active zeolite in ethanol dehydration at low temperature.•H-MFI and H-BEA give highest yield to diethyl ether (>70% at 473K).•H-FER and H-FAU give stable 99.9% yield to ethylene at 573K.•Confinement effects best explain the different behaviours of zeolites.•Zeolites have more a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied catalysis. A, General General, 2015-03, Vol.493, p.77-89
Hauptverfasser: Phung, Thanh Khoa, Proietti Hernández, Loriana, Lagazzo, Alberto, Busca, Guido
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•H-MOR is the most active zeolite in ethanol dehydration at low temperature.•H-MFI and H-BEA give highest yield to diethyl ether (>70% at 473K).•H-FER and H-FAU give stable 99.9% yield to ethylene at 573K.•Confinement effects best explain the different behaviours of zeolites.•Zeolites have more active and different Brønsted sites than silica alumina. Ethanol dehydration was investigated over commercial H-FER, H-MFI, H-MOR, H-BEA, H-Y and H-USY zeolite samples, and alumina and silica alumina for comparison. The catalysts were characterized using FT-IR spectroscopy of the surface OH groups and of adsorbed CO and pyridine. UV–vis, Raman and TG-DTA were applied to characterize coke, formed more on H-MOR and H-BEA. H-zeolites are definitely more active than silica alumina and alumina on catalyst weight base. The H-MOR sample is the most active but the H-MFI samples with Si/Al2 ratios 280 and 50 show higher reaction rates per Al ion, H-FER and faujasites show highest ethylene yield (99.9% at 573K). At lower temperature and higher space velocities, diethyl ether is formed with high yield (>70% at 453–473K on H-BEA and H-MFI (50)). Overconversion of ethylene mainly to aromatics is observed on H-MFI (50). The different behaviour of protonic zeolites can predominantly be explained by confinement effects on the different zeolite cavities.
ISSN:0926-860X
1873-3875
DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2014.12.047