Factors Associated With Discharge to Home Versus Discharge to Institutional Care After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation
Abstract Objective To examine sociodemographic and clinical characteristics independently associated with discharge home compared with discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) after acute inpatient rehabilitation. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Three tertiary accredited acute care r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2015-07, Vol.96 (7), p.1297-1303 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1303 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1297 |
container_title | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
container_volume | 96 |
creator | Nguyen, Vu Q.C., MD PrvuBettger, Janet, ScD Guerrier, Tami, BS Hirsch, Mark A., PhD Thomas, J. George, MD Pugh, Terrence M., MD Rhoads, Charles F., MD |
description | Abstract Objective To examine sociodemographic and clinical characteristics independently associated with discharge home compared with discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) after acute inpatient rehabilitation. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Three tertiary accredited acute care rehabilitation facilities. Participants Adult patients with stroke (N=2085). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Not applicable. Results Of 2085 patients with stroke treated at 3 centers over a 4-year period, 78.2% (n=1631) were discharged home and 21.8% (n=454) discharged to an SNF. Findings from a multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that patients were less likely to be discharged home if they were older (odds ratio [OR], .98; 95% confidence interval [CI], .96–.99), separated or divorced (compared with married; OR, .61; 95% CI, .48–.79), or with Medicare health insurance (compared with private insurance; OR, .69; 95% CI, .55–.88), or had dysphagia (OR, .83; 95% CI, .71–.98) or cognitive deficits (OR, .79; 95% CI, .77–.81). The odds of being discharged home were higher for those admitted with a higher motor FIM score (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09–1.11). The following were not associated with discharge disposition: sex, race, prestroke vocational status, availability of secondary health insurance, number of days from stroke onset to rehabilitation facility admission, stroke type, impairment group, cognitive FIM on admission, other stroke deficits (aphasia, ataxia, neglect, or speech disturbance), stroke complications of hyponatremia or urinary tract infection, or comorbid conditions. Conclusions One in 5 patients with stroke were discharged to an SNF after inpatient rehabilitation. On admission, several sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were identified that could be considered as important factors in early discussions for discharge planning. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1691598189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0003999315002555</els_id><sourcerecordid>1691598189</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-e4fbac43d8c66abc466b4eb29fed7970bf8ffb76e3184ed4671b9541140f16b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpabZp_0APRcde7EjWhy0ohWXbNIFAoenXTUjyuKuNvdpIciD_vjKbFNpDT8Mw7_sy8wxCrympKaHybFebwxTrhlBRE1YT0j5BKypYU3UN_fkUrQghrFJKsRP0IqVdaaVg9Dk6aUTXMMXJCt2dG5dDTHidUnDeZOjxD5-3-INPbmviL8A54IswAf4OMc3p78HlPmWf5-zD3ox4YyLg9ZAhlsHBZA_7jK9zDDeAv8DWWD_6bBbxS_RsMGOCVw_1FH07__h1c1Fdff50uVlfVY53NFfAB2scZ33npDTWcSktB9uoAfpWtcQO3TDYVgKjHYeey5ZaJTilnAxUWslO0dtj7iGG2xlS1lNZH8bR7CHMSVOpqFAd7VSRNkepiyGlCIM-RD-ZeK8p0QtvvdMLb73w1oTpwruY3jzkz3aC_o_lEXARvDsKoFx55yHq5AoWB72P4LLug_9__vt_7G70e-_MeAP3kHZhjgV8uUOnRhN9vXx8eTgVhDRCCPYbhbyoLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1691598189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors Associated With Discharge to Home Versus Discharge to Institutional Care After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Nguyen, Vu Q.C., MD ; PrvuBettger, Janet, ScD ; Guerrier, Tami, BS ; Hirsch, Mark A., PhD ; Thomas, J. George, MD ; Pugh, Terrence M., MD ; Rhoads, Charles F., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Vu Q.C., MD ; PrvuBettger, Janet, ScD ; Guerrier, Tami, BS ; Hirsch, Mark A., PhD ; Thomas, J. George, MD ; Pugh, Terrence M., MD ; Rhoads, Charles F., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To examine sociodemographic and clinical characteristics independently associated with discharge home compared with discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) after acute inpatient rehabilitation. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Three tertiary accredited acute care rehabilitation facilities. Participants Adult patients with stroke (N=2085). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Not applicable. Results Of 2085 patients with stroke treated at 3 centers over a 4-year period, 78.2% (n=1631) were discharged home and 21.8% (n=454) discharged to an SNF. Findings from a multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that patients were less likely to be discharged home if they were older (odds ratio [OR], .98; 95% confidence interval [CI], .96–.99), separated or divorced (compared with married; OR, .61; 95% CI, .48–.79), or with Medicare health insurance (compared with private insurance; OR, .69; 95% CI, .55–.88), or had dysphagia (OR, .83; 95% CI, .71–.98) or cognitive deficits (OR, .79; 95% CI, .77–.81). The odds of being discharged home were higher for those admitted with a higher motor FIM score (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09–1.11). The following were not associated with discharge disposition: sex, race, prestroke vocational status, availability of secondary health insurance, number of days from stroke onset to rehabilitation facility admission, stroke type, impairment group, cognitive FIM on admission, other stroke deficits (aphasia, ataxia, neglect, or speech disturbance), stroke complications of hyponatremia or urinary tract infection, or comorbid conditions. Conclusions One in 5 patients with stroke were discharged to an SNF after inpatient rehabilitation. On admission, several sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were identified that could be considered as important factors in early discussions for discharge planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25823940</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Health Status ; Humans ; Inpatients ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Outcome assessment (health care) ; Patient Discharge - statistics & numerical data ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Recovery of Function ; Rehabilitation ; Rehabilitation Centers - statistics & numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Sex Factors ; Skilled Nursing Facilities - statistics & numerical data ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Stroke ; Stroke Rehabilitation ; Time Factors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2015-07, Vol.96 (7), p.1297-1303</ispartof><rights>American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>2015 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-e4fbac43d8c66abc466b4eb29fed7970bf8ffb76e3184ed4671b9541140f16b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-e4fbac43d8c66abc466b4eb29fed7970bf8ffb76e3184ed4671b9541140f16b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999315002555$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25823940$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Vu Q.C., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PrvuBettger, Janet, ScD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrier, Tami, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, Mark A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, J. George, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugh, Terrence M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhoads, Charles F., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Factors Associated With Discharge to Home Versus Discharge to Institutional Care After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To examine sociodemographic and clinical characteristics independently associated with discharge home compared with discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) after acute inpatient rehabilitation. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Three tertiary accredited acute care rehabilitation facilities. Participants Adult patients with stroke (N=2085). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Not applicable. Results Of 2085 patients with stroke treated at 3 centers over a 4-year period, 78.2% (n=1631) were discharged home and 21.8% (n=454) discharged to an SNF. Findings from a multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that patients were less likely to be discharged home if they were older (odds ratio [OR], .98; 95% confidence interval [CI], .96–.99), separated or divorced (compared with married; OR, .61; 95% CI, .48–.79), or with Medicare health insurance (compared with private insurance; OR, .69; 95% CI, .55–.88), or had dysphagia (OR, .83; 95% CI, .71–.98) or cognitive deficits (OR, .79; 95% CI, .77–.81). The odds of being discharged home were higher for those admitted with a higher motor FIM score (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09–1.11). The following were not associated with discharge disposition: sex, race, prestroke vocational status, availability of secondary health insurance, number of days from stroke onset to rehabilitation facility admission, stroke type, impairment group, cognitive FIM on admission, other stroke deficits (aphasia, ataxia, neglect, or speech disturbance), stroke complications of hyponatremia or urinary tract infection, or comorbid conditions. Conclusions One in 5 patients with stroke were discharged to an SNF after inpatient rehabilitation. On admission, several sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were identified that could be considered as important factors in early discussions for discharge planning.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatients</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcome assessment (health care)</subject><subject>Patient Discharge - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Centers - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Skilled Nursing Facilities - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpabZp_0APRcde7EjWhy0ohWXbNIFAoenXTUjyuKuNvdpIciD_vjKbFNpDT8Mw7_sy8wxCrympKaHybFebwxTrhlBRE1YT0j5BKypYU3UN_fkUrQghrFJKsRP0IqVdaaVg9Dk6aUTXMMXJCt2dG5dDTHidUnDeZOjxD5-3-INPbmviL8A54IswAf4OMc3p78HlPmWf5-zD3ox4YyLg9ZAhlsHBZA_7jK9zDDeAv8DWWD_6bBbxS_RsMGOCVw_1FH07__h1c1Fdff50uVlfVY53NFfAB2scZ33npDTWcSktB9uoAfpWtcQO3TDYVgKjHYeey5ZaJTilnAxUWslO0dtj7iGG2xlS1lNZH8bR7CHMSVOpqFAd7VSRNkepiyGlCIM-RD-ZeK8p0QtvvdMLb73w1oTpwruY3jzkz3aC_o_lEXARvDsKoFx55yHq5AoWB72P4LLug_9__vt_7G70e-_MeAP3kHZhjgV8uUOnRhN9vXx8eTgVhDRCCPYbhbyoLQ</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Nguyen, Vu Q.C., MD</creator><creator>PrvuBettger, Janet, ScD</creator><creator>Guerrier, Tami, BS</creator><creator>Hirsch, Mark A., PhD</creator><creator>Thomas, J. George, MD</creator><creator>Pugh, Terrence M., MD</creator><creator>Rhoads, Charles F., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Factors Associated With Discharge to Home Versus Discharge to Institutional Care After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation</title><author>Nguyen, Vu Q.C., MD ; PrvuBettger, Janet, ScD ; Guerrier, Tami, BS ; Hirsch, Mark A., PhD ; Thomas, J. George, MD ; Pugh, Terrence M., MD ; Rhoads, Charles F., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-e4fbac43d8c66abc466b4eb29fed7970bf8ffb76e3184ed4671b9541140f16b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatients</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcome assessment (health care)</topic><topic>Patient Discharge - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Centers - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Skilled Nursing Facilities - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Vu Q.C., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PrvuBettger, Janet, ScD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrier, Tami, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, Mark A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, J. George, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugh, Terrence M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhoads, Charles F., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen, Vu Q.C., MD</au><au>PrvuBettger, Janet, ScD</au><au>Guerrier, Tami, BS</au><au>Hirsch, Mark A., PhD</au><au>Thomas, J. George, MD</au><au>Pugh, Terrence M., MD</au><au>Rhoads, Charles F., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors Associated With Discharge to Home Versus Discharge to Institutional Care After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1297</spage><epage>1303</epage><pages>1297-1303</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To examine sociodemographic and clinical characteristics independently associated with discharge home compared with discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) after acute inpatient rehabilitation. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Three tertiary accredited acute care rehabilitation facilities. Participants Adult patients with stroke (N=2085). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Not applicable. Results Of 2085 patients with stroke treated at 3 centers over a 4-year period, 78.2% (n=1631) were discharged home and 21.8% (n=454) discharged to an SNF. Findings from a multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that patients were less likely to be discharged home if they were older (odds ratio [OR], .98; 95% confidence interval [CI], .96–.99), separated or divorced (compared with married; OR, .61; 95% CI, .48–.79), or with Medicare health insurance (compared with private insurance; OR, .69; 95% CI, .55–.88), or had dysphagia (OR, .83; 95% CI, .71–.98) or cognitive deficits (OR, .79; 95% CI, .77–.81). The odds of being discharged home were higher for those admitted with a higher motor FIM score (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09–1.11). The following were not associated with discharge disposition: sex, race, prestroke vocational status, availability of secondary health insurance, number of days from stroke onset to rehabilitation facility admission, stroke type, impairment group, cognitive FIM on admission, other stroke deficits (aphasia, ataxia, neglect, or speech disturbance), stroke complications of hyponatremia or urinary tract infection, or comorbid conditions. Conclusions One in 5 patients with stroke were discharged to an SNF after inpatient rehabilitation. On admission, several sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were identified that could be considered as important factors in early discussions for discharge planning.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25823940</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.007</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9993 |
ispartof | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2015-07, Vol.96 (7), p.1297-1303 |
issn | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1691598189 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Disability Evaluation Female Health Status Humans Inpatients Length of Stay Male Middle Aged Outcome assessment (health care) Patient Discharge - statistics & numerical data Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Recovery of Function Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Centers - statistics & numerical data Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Sex Factors Skilled Nursing Facilities - statistics & numerical data Socioeconomic Factors Stroke Stroke Rehabilitation Time Factors Young Adult |
title | Factors Associated With Discharge to Home Versus Discharge to Institutional Care After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T18%3A18%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20Associated%20With%20Discharge%20to%20Home%20Versus%20Discharge%20to%20Institutional%20Care%20After%20Inpatient%20Stroke%20Rehabilitation&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Nguyen,%20Vu%20Q.C.,%20MD&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1297&rft.epage=1303&rft.pages=1297-1303&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1691598189%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1691598189&rft_id=info:pmid/25823940&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0003999315002555&rfr_iscdi=true |