Factors Associated With Discharge to Home Versus Discharge to Institutional Care After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation

Abstract Objective To examine sociodemographic and clinical characteristics independently associated with discharge home compared with discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) after acute inpatient rehabilitation. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Three tertiary accredited acute care r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2015-07, Vol.96 (7), p.1297-1303
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen, Vu Q.C., MD, PrvuBettger, Janet, ScD, Guerrier, Tami, BS, Hirsch, Mark A., PhD, Thomas, J. George, MD, Pugh, Terrence M., MD, Rhoads, Charles F., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1303
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1297
container_title Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
container_volume 96
creator Nguyen, Vu Q.C., MD
PrvuBettger, Janet, ScD
Guerrier, Tami, BS
Hirsch, Mark A., PhD
Thomas, J. George, MD
Pugh, Terrence M., MD
Rhoads, Charles F., MD
description Abstract Objective To examine sociodemographic and clinical characteristics independently associated with discharge home compared with discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) after acute inpatient rehabilitation. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Three tertiary accredited acute care rehabilitation facilities. Participants Adult patients with stroke (N=2085). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Not applicable. Results Of 2085 patients with stroke treated at 3 centers over a 4-year period, 78.2% (n=1631) were discharged home and 21.8% (n=454) discharged to an SNF. Findings from a multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that patients were less likely to be discharged home if they were older (odds ratio [OR], .98; 95% confidence interval [CI], .96–.99), separated or divorced (compared with married; OR, .61; 95% CI, .48–.79), or with Medicare health insurance (compared with private insurance; OR, .69; 95% CI, .55–.88), or had dysphagia (OR, .83; 95% CI, .71–.98) or cognitive deficits (OR, .79; 95% CI, .77–.81). The odds of being discharged home were higher for those admitted with a higher motor FIM score (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09–1.11). The following were not associated with discharge disposition: sex, race, prestroke vocational status, availability of secondary health insurance, number of days from stroke onset to rehabilitation facility admission, stroke type, impairment group, cognitive FIM on admission, other stroke deficits (aphasia, ataxia, neglect, or speech disturbance), stroke complications of hyponatremia or urinary tract infection, or comorbid conditions. Conclusions One in 5 patients with stroke were discharged to an SNF after inpatient rehabilitation. On admission, several sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were identified that could be considered as important factors in early discussions for discharge planning.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1691598189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0003999315002555</els_id><sourcerecordid>1691598189</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-e4fbac43d8c66abc466b4eb29fed7970bf8ffb76e3184ed4671b9541140f16b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpabZp_0APRcde7EjWhy0ohWXbNIFAoenXTUjyuKuNvdpIciD_vjKbFNpDT8Mw7_sy8wxCrympKaHybFebwxTrhlBRE1YT0j5BKypYU3UN_fkUrQghrFJKsRP0IqVdaaVg9Dk6aUTXMMXJCt2dG5dDTHidUnDeZOjxD5-3-INPbmviL8A54IswAf4OMc3p78HlPmWf5-zD3ox4YyLg9ZAhlsHBZA_7jK9zDDeAv8DWWD_6bBbxS_RsMGOCVw_1FH07__h1c1Fdff50uVlfVY53NFfAB2scZ33npDTWcSktB9uoAfpWtcQO3TDYVgKjHYeey5ZaJTilnAxUWslO0dtj7iGG2xlS1lNZH8bR7CHMSVOpqFAd7VSRNkepiyGlCIM-RD-ZeK8p0QtvvdMLb73w1oTpwruY3jzkz3aC_o_lEXARvDsKoFx55yHq5AoWB72P4LLug_9__vt_7G70e-_MeAP3kHZhjgV8uUOnRhN9vXx8eTgVhDRCCPYbhbyoLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1691598189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors Associated With Discharge to Home Versus Discharge to Institutional Care After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Nguyen, Vu Q.C., MD ; PrvuBettger, Janet, ScD ; Guerrier, Tami, BS ; Hirsch, Mark A., PhD ; Thomas, J. George, MD ; Pugh, Terrence M., MD ; Rhoads, Charles F., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Vu Q.C., MD ; PrvuBettger, Janet, ScD ; Guerrier, Tami, BS ; Hirsch, Mark A., PhD ; Thomas, J. George, MD ; Pugh, Terrence M., MD ; Rhoads, Charles F., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To examine sociodemographic and clinical characteristics independently associated with discharge home compared with discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) after acute inpatient rehabilitation. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Three tertiary accredited acute care rehabilitation facilities. Participants Adult patients with stroke (N=2085). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Not applicable. Results Of 2085 patients with stroke treated at 3 centers over a 4-year period, 78.2% (n=1631) were discharged home and 21.8% (n=454) discharged to an SNF. Findings from a multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that patients were less likely to be discharged home if they were older (odds ratio [OR], .98; 95% confidence interval [CI], .96–.99), separated or divorced (compared with married; OR, .61; 95% CI, .48–.79), or with Medicare health insurance (compared with private insurance; OR, .69; 95% CI, .55–.88), or had dysphagia (OR, .83; 95% CI, .71–.98) or cognitive deficits (OR, .79; 95% CI, .77–.81). The odds of being discharged home were higher for those admitted with a higher motor FIM score (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09–1.11). The following were not associated with discharge disposition: sex, race, prestroke vocational status, availability of secondary health insurance, number of days from stroke onset to rehabilitation facility admission, stroke type, impairment group, cognitive FIM on admission, other stroke deficits (aphasia, ataxia, neglect, or speech disturbance), stroke complications of hyponatremia or urinary tract infection, or comorbid conditions. Conclusions One in 5 patients with stroke were discharged to an SNF after inpatient rehabilitation. On admission, several sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were identified that could be considered as important factors in early discussions for discharge planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25823940</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Health Status ; Humans ; Inpatients ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Outcome assessment (health care) ; Patient Discharge - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Recovery of Function ; Rehabilitation ; Rehabilitation Centers - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Sex Factors ; Skilled Nursing Facilities - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Stroke ; Stroke Rehabilitation ; Time Factors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2015-07, Vol.96 (7), p.1297-1303</ispartof><rights>American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>2015 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-e4fbac43d8c66abc466b4eb29fed7970bf8ffb76e3184ed4671b9541140f16b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-e4fbac43d8c66abc466b4eb29fed7970bf8ffb76e3184ed4671b9541140f16b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999315002555$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25823940$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Vu Q.C., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PrvuBettger, Janet, ScD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrier, Tami, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, Mark A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, J. George, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugh, Terrence M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhoads, Charles F., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Factors Associated With Discharge to Home Versus Discharge to Institutional Care After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To examine sociodemographic and clinical characteristics independently associated with discharge home compared with discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) after acute inpatient rehabilitation. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Three tertiary accredited acute care rehabilitation facilities. Participants Adult patients with stroke (N=2085). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Not applicable. Results Of 2085 patients with stroke treated at 3 centers over a 4-year period, 78.2% (n=1631) were discharged home and 21.8% (n=454) discharged to an SNF. Findings from a multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that patients were less likely to be discharged home if they were older (odds ratio [OR], .98; 95% confidence interval [CI], .96–.99), separated or divorced (compared with married; OR, .61; 95% CI, .48–.79), or with Medicare health insurance (compared with private insurance; OR, .69; 95% CI, .55–.88), or had dysphagia (OR, .83; 95% CI, .71–.98) or cognitive deficits (OR, .79; 95% CI, .77–.81). The odds of being discharged home were higher for those admitted with a higher motor FIM score (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09–1.11). The following were not associated with discharge disposition: sex, race, prestroke vocational status, availability of secondary health insurance, number of days from stroke onset to rehabilitation facility admission, stroke type, impairment group, cognitive FIM on admission, other stroke deficits (aphasia, ataxia, neglect, or speech disturbance), stroke complications of hyponatremia or urinary tract infection, or comorbid conditions. Conclusions One in 5 patients with stroke were discharged to an SNF after inpatient rehabilitation. On admission, several sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were identified that could be considered as important factors in early discussions for discharge planning.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatients</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcome assessment (health care)</subject><subject>Patient Discharge - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Centers - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Skilled Nursing Facilities - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpabZp_0APRcde7EjWhy0ohWXbNIFAoenXTUjyuKuNvdpIciD_vjKbFNpDT8Mw7_sy8wxCrympKaHybFebwxTrhlBRE1YT0j5BKypYU3UN_fkUrQghrFJKsRP0IqVdaaVg9Dk6aUTXMMXJCt2dG5dDTHidUnDeZOjxD5-3-INPbmviL8A54IswAf4OMc3p78HlPmWf5-zD3ox4YyLg9ZAhlsHBZA_7jK9zDDeAv8DWWD_6bBbxS_RsMGOCVw_1FH07__h1c1Fdff50uVlfVY53NFfAB2scZ33npDTWcSktB9uoAfpWtcQO3TDYVgKjHYeey5ZaJTilnAxUWslO0dtj7iGG2xlS1lNZH8bR7CHMSVOpqFAd7VSRNkepiyGlCIM-RD-ZeK8p0QtvvdMLb73w1oTpwruY3jzkz3aC_o_lEXARvDsKoFx55yHq5AoWB72P4LLug_9__vt_7G70e-_MeAP3kHZhjgV8uUOnRhN9vXx8eTgVhDRCCPYbhbyoLQ</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Nguyen, Vu Q.C., MD</creator><creator>PrvuBettger, Janet, ScD</creator><creator>Guerrier, Tami, BS</creator><creator>Hirsch, Mark A., PhD</creator><creator>Thomas, J. George, MD</creator><creator>Pugh, Terrence M., MD</creator><creator>Rhoads, Charles F., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Factors Associated With Discharge to Home Versus Discharge to Institutional Care After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation</title><author>Nguyen, Vu Q.C., MD ; PrvuBettger, Janet, ScD ; Guerrier, Tami, BS ; Hirsch, Mark A., PhD ; Thomas, J. George, MD ; Pugh, Terrence M., MD ; Rhoads, Charles F., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-e4fbac43d8c66abc466b4eb29fed7970bf8ffb76e3184ed4671b9541140f16b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatients</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcome assessment (health care)</topic><topic>Patient Discharge - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Centers - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Skilled Nursing Facilities - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Vu Q.C., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PrvuBettger, Janet, ScD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrier, Tami, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, Mark A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, J. George, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugh, Terrence M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhoads, Charles F., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen, Vu Q.C., MD</au><au>PrvuBettger, Janet, ScD</au><au>Guerrier, Tami, BS</au><au>Hirsch, Mark A., PhD</au><au>Thomas, J. George, MD</au><au>Pugh, Terrence M., MD</au><au>Rhoads, Charles F., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors Associated With Discharge to Home Versus Discharge to Institutional Care After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1297</spage><epage>1303</epage><pages>1297-1303</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To examine sociodemographic and clinical characteristics independently associated with discharge home compared with discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) after acute inpatient rehabilitation. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Three tertiary accredited acute care rehabilitation facilities. Participants Adult patients with stroke (N=2085). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Not applicable. Results Of 2085 patients with stroke treated at 3 centers over a 4-year period, 78.2% (n=1631) were discharged home and 21.8% (n=454) discharged to an SNF. Findings from a multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that patients were less likely to be discharged home if they were older (odds ratio [OR], .98; 95% confidence interval [CI], .96–.99), separated or divorced (compared with married; OR, .61; 95% CI, .48–.79), or with Medicare health insurance (compared with private insurance; OR, .69; 95% CI, .55–.88), or had dysphagia (OR, .83; 95% CI, .71–.98) or cognitive deficits (OR, .79; 95% CI, .77–.81). The odds of being discharged home were higher for those admitted with a higher motor FIM score (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09–1.11). The following were not associated with discharge disposition: sex, race, prestroke vocational status, availability of secondary health insurance, number of days from stroke onset to rehabilitation facility admission, stroke type, impairment group, cognitive FIM on admission, other stroke deficits (aphasia, ataxia, neglect, or speech disturbance), stroke complications of hyponatremia or urinary tract infection, or comorbid conditions. Conclusions One in 5 patients with stroke were discharged to an SNF after inpatient rehabilitation. On admission, several sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were identified that could be considered as important factors in early discussions for discharge planning.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25823940</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.007</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9993
ispartof Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2015-07, Vol.96 (7), p.1297-1303
issn 0003-9993
1532-821X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1691598189
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Disability Evaluation
Female
Health Status
Humans
Inpatients
Length of Stay
Male
Middle Aged
Outcome assessment (health care)
Patient Discharge - statistics & numerical data
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Recovery of Function
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation Centers - statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Sex Factors
Skilled Nursing Facilities - statistics & numerical data
Socioeconomic Factors
Stroke
Stroke Rehabilitation
Time Factors
Young Adult
title Factors Associated With Discharge to Home Versus Discharge to Institutional Care After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T18%3A18%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20Associated%20With%20Discharge%20to%20Home%20Versus%20Discharge%20to%20Institutional%20Care%20After%20Inpatient%20Stroke%20Rehabilitation&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Nguyen,%20Vu%20Q.C.,%20MD&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1297&rft.epage=1303&rft.pages=1297-1303&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1691598189%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1691598189&rft_id=info:pmid/25823940&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0003999315002555&rfr_iscdi=true