Helicobacter infections with rare bacteria or minimal gastritis: Expecting the unexpected

Abstract Background The routine use of special stains for detection of Helicobacter remains controversial. Aims To determine the frequency of histologically atypical Helicobacter infection. Methods All gastric biopsies received at a large pathology reference laboratory over a 6-month period were sta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Digestive and liver disease 2015-07, Vol.47 (7), p.549-555
Hauptverfasser: Glickman, Jonathan N, Noffsinger, Amy, Nevin, Daniel T, Ray, Mukunda, Lash, Richard H, Genta, Robert M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background The routine use of special stains for detection of Helicobacter remains controversial. Aims To determine the frequency of histologically atypical Helicobacter infection. Methods All gastric biopsies received at a large pathology reference laboratory over a 6-month period were stained for Helicobacter , and the histologic and clinicopathologic parameters evaluated. Results Amongst 7663 Helicobacter -positive biopsies, 823 (10.7%) did not show typical chronic active gastritis with numerous Helicobacter organisms, and were therefore considered histologically atypical. Rare Helicobacter pylori organisms accounted for 58.0% of all atypical infections; the next most common atypical Helicobacter infection was that with minimal or no gastric inflammation (23.3% of atypical infections). Patients in these groups did not differ demographically from those with other forms of atypical or typical Helicobacter infection, although a small subgroup (6%) was more likely to have had a previously treated infection. Conclusions In many of these atypical infections, Helicobacter would not have been suspected based on the histologic findings alone, and would have been missed without routine special stains. Performing a sensitive stain could prevent additional testing and allow prompt treatment of the affected patients, thus substantially reducing the risk for peptic ulcer and gastric cancer and preventing the transmission of the infection to family members.
ISSN:1590-8658
1878-3562
DOI:10.1016/j.dld.2015.04.005